ECONOMIC PHASES OF DOMESTIC SERVICE[185]
The attempt has been made in the foregoing chapters to indicate the
extent to which domestic employments and domestic service have been
influenced by industrial and political events arising outside of the
household, and apparently having little or no connection with it. That
domestic service is amenable to some of the general economic laws and
conditions which affect other occupations and that it is also governed
by economic laws developed within itself will perhaps be evident from an
examination of a few of these economic conditions and principles. These
may be stated for the sake of brevity in the form of propositions.
The first group of propositions to be suggested concerns the number and
distribution of persons of foreign birth engaged in domestic service.
(1) A large proportion of the domestic employees in the United States are
of foreign birth. This is evident from the following table prepared from
the schedules sent out:[186]
TABLE I
PLACE OF BIRTH OF EMPLOYEES
=================+========================+========================
| NUMBER | PER CENT
PERSON REPORTING +-------+--------+-------+-------+--------+-------
| Native| Foreign| Not | Native| Foreign| Not
| born | born | given | born | born | given
-----------------+-------+--------+-------+-------+--------+--------
Employer | 922 | 1,212 | 411 | 36.23| 47.62 | 16.15
Employee | 324 | 395 | | 45.06| 54.94 |
=================+=======+========+=======+=======+========+========
The statement may be more fully illustrated from the Eleventh Census,
which shows that the number of foreign born in domestic service is 30.86
per cent of the entire number.[187] The geographical distribution of the
different classes of domestic employees is seen from Table II on the
following page.
Another illustration of the same point is found by an examination of the
relative number of native born and foreign born domestic employees in
the individual states and territories. In nine states and territories
the number of foreign born domestic employees exceeds the number of
native born white employees,[188] in sixteen about one half of the white
domestic employees are of foreign birth,[189] in twenty-four states and
territories the number of native born white employees largely exceeds
the foreign born,[190] while in fifteen states colored employees are
in excess.[191] It will be seen that the states in which the number of
native born white domestic employees exceeds the number of the foreign
born are those states having relatively a small number of foreign born
residents.[192] A still more specific illustration is found in the
experience of one state. In Massachusetts in 1885, the foreign born
domestic servants formed 60.24 per cent of the entire number.[193]
TABLE II
DOMESTIC EMPLOYEES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1890
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account