Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821-1881; Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821-1881 -- Criticism and interpretation
At last, freed from his horrible financial worries, he busies himself
during the closing years of his life with editing the _Journal of an
Author_, published only at irregular intervals. “I confess,” he wrote
to the well-known Aksakov in November, 1880 (that is, three months
before his death), “I confess, in all friendship, that intending to
undertake next year the publication of the _Journal_, I have besought
God often and long to make me pure in heart and pure of lips; without
sin or envy, and incapable of wounding.”[30]
In this _Journal_ wherein M. de Vogüé could see only “obscure pæans,
evading alike analysis and discussion,” the Russian people happily
discovered something different, and Dostoevsky was able to feel that
round about his work his dream of spiritual harmony was almost being
realized, without any arbitrary unification.
When his death was announced, this communion and blending of spirits
was shiningly manifested, and if, at first, “subversive elements
planned to monopolize his dead body,” very soon, “by the miracle of
one of these unexpected fusions that are Russia’s secret, when a
national conviction rouses her, all parties, all antagonists, all
scattered fragments of the empire were seen to be joined in a fresh
bond of enthusiasm by this death.” The sentence is M. de Vogüé’s, and I
rejoice after all the strictures I have made concerning his study, to
be able to quote such noble words. “As it was said of the Tsars of old,
that they gathered together the land of Russia,” he says later, “this
spiritual King had ‘gathered together’ the heart of Russia.”
The same rallying of individual energies is at work now throughout
Europe, slowly, mysteriously, almost--chiefly in Germany, where the
editions of his works are multiplying, in France, too, where the rising
generation recognizes and appreciates, better than that of M. de Vogüé,
his strength. The hidden reasons which delayed his success will be the
builders of a more enduring fame.
FOOTNOTES
[5] M. Gide refers to J. W. Bienstock’s translation, _Correspondance et
Voyage à l’Étranger_, Paris, 1908. (_Translator’s note._)
[6] Letter to his brother Michael, Semipalatinsk, May 31, 1858.
[7] Bienstock, p. 122. Letter to A. N. Maïkov, Semipalatinsk, January
18, 1856.
[8] Bienstock, p. 364. Letter to N. N. Strakhov, Dresden, February 26,
1870.
[9] Bienstock, p. 387-388. Letter to N. N. Strakhov, Dresden, December
2, 1870.
[10] Bienstock, p. 415. Letter to A. N. Maïkov, Dresden, March 2, 1871.
[11] Bienstock, pp. 364-365. Letter to N. N. Strakhov, Dresden,
February 26, 1870.
[12] Bienstock, p. 55. Letter to his brother Michael, March 24, 1845.
[13] Mayne, p. 198. Letter to N. N. Strakhov, Dresden, October 9, 1870.
[14] Bienstock, pp. 386-387. Letter to N. N. Strakhov, Dresden,
December 2, 1870.
[15] Bienstock, p. 267. Letter to A. N. Maïkov, Geneva, September 15,
1867.
[16] Bienstock, pp. 470-471. Letter to Mlle. N. N----, Petersburg,
April 11, 1880.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account