Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821-1881; Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821-1881 -- Criticism and interpretation
My pre-war plan of the biography comprised an introduction in which
I proposed to discuss the commonly accepted idea of him. To throw
light on the subject, I should have drawn a parallel between him and
Rousseau--and no arbitrary one, I can assure you. Their natures reveal
such deep-laid analogies that Rousseau’s _Confessions_ were able to
exert an extraordinary influence on Dostoevsky. But in my opinion
Rousseau, from the very beginning of his life, was poisoned, as it
were, by Plutarch, through whom he fashioned for himself a somewhat
rhetorical and pompous notion of a “great man.” He set up before
himself the image of a fancied hero, and his life was one prolonged
effort to be like it. He tried hard to _be_ what he wanted to _seem_.
I allow that his painting of his own character may be sincere, but he
is ever thinking of his pose, which pride alone dictates.
“False greatness,” in the admirable words of La Bruyère, “is shy and
inaccessible. Conscious of its foible, it hides away, or at least
never shows an open face, letting be seen only as much as will make
an impression and save it from being revealed for what it really is,
something mean and small.”
And if I do not go so far as to recognize Rousseau in this description,
I _do_ think of Dostoevsky when a little farther on I read:
“True greatness is free, gentle, familiar, unaffected; it can be
touched and handled, and loses nothing when seen at close quarters.
The better you are acquainted with it, the more you admire it. It
bends out of goodness of heart to its inferiors, and returns to its
own level without effort. Sometimes it lets itself go, neglecting and
surrendering its natural advantages, but ever ready to recover them and
put them to use.”
With Dostoevsky there is this complete absence of pose or
stage-management. He never considers himself a _superman_. He is most
humbly human, and I do not think that pride of intellect could ever
properly understand him.
The word _humility_ comes up again and again in his letters and
works. “Why should they deny me? I make no demands. I am but a humble
petitioner.” (November 23, 1869.)--“I do not demand, I only seek in
all humility.” (December 7, 1869.)--“I have made the humblest of
requests.” (February 12, 1870.)
“He often astonished me by a kind of humility,” says the _Raw Youth_ in
speaking of his father, and in his effort to understand the possible
relations between his father and mother, and the quality of their love,
he recollects his father’s phrase, “She married me out of humility.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account