Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821-1881; Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821-1881 -- Criticism and interpretation
In Germany translations of Dostoevsky are multiplying, each an
advance on its predecessor as regards vigour and scrupulous accuracy.
England, stubborn and slow to move, yet makes it her concern not to be
outstripped. When he introduced Mrs. Constance Garnett’s translation in
the _New Age_, Arnold Bennett wished all English novelists and short
story writers could come under the influence of these “most powerful
works of the imagination ever produced.” Speaking more particularly
of _The Brothers Karamazov_, he declared this book, in which human
passion reaches its maximum intensity, contains about a dozen figures
that are simply colossal. Who can tell if these colossal figures have
ever made, even in Russia, so direct appeal as to us, whether their
call sounded ever before so pressing?
Dostoevsky’s admirers were recently rare enough, but as invariably
happens when the earliest enthusiasts are recruited from the élite,
their number goes on increasing steadily. First of all, I should like
to inquire how it is that certain minds are still obdurately prejudiced
against his work, admirable though it be. Because the best way to
overcome a lack of comprehension is to accept it as sincere and try to
understand it.
The principal charge brought against Dostoevsky in the name of our
Western-European logic has been, I think, the irrational, irresolute,
and often irresponsible nature of his characters, everything in their
appearance that could seem grotesque and wild. It is not, so people
aver, real life that he unfolds, but nightmares. In my belief this
is utterly mistaken; but let us grant the truth of it for argument’s
sake, and refrain from answering after the manner of Freud that there
is more sincerity in our dream-life than in the actions of our real
existence. Hear rather what Dostoevsky has to say for himself on the
subject of dreams: “These obvious absurdities and impossibilities with
which your dream was overflowing ... you accepted all at once, almost
without the slightest surprise, at the very time when, on another
side, your reason was at its highest tension and showed extraordinary
power, cunning, sagacity, and logic. And why, too, on waking and fully
returning to reality, do you feel almost every time, and sometimes
with extraordinary intensity, that you have left something unexplained
behind with the dream, and at the same time you feel that interwoven
with these absurdities some thought lies hidden, and a thought that is
real, something belonging to your actual life, something that exists
and always has existed in your heart. It’s as though something new,
prophetic, that you were awaiting, has been told you in your dream.”[1]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account