Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821-1881; Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821-1881 -- Criticism and interpretation
There are, in Dostoevsky’s life, certain extremely obscure episodes.
One, in particular, already alluded to in _Crime and Punishment_ and
which seems to have served as theme for a certain chapter in _The
Possessed_. This chapter does not figure in the novel, having been
so far withheld in Russia even. It has, I believe, been printed in
Germany, but in an edition for private circulation only.[49] It deals
with the rape of a young girl. The child victim hangs herself, and in
the next room, Stavrogin, the guilty man, knowing that she is hanging
herself, waits until life has left her little body. What measure of
truth is there in this sinister tale? For the moment, it is not for
me to say. The fact remains that Dostoevsky, after an adventure of
this nature, was moved to what one must needs describe as remorse.
This remorse preyed upon him for a while, and doubtless he said to
himself what Sonia said to Raskolnikov. The need for confession became
urgent, but confession not merely to a priest. He sought to find the
person before whom confession would cause him the acutest suffering.
Turgeniev, without the shadow of a doubt! Dostoevsky had not seen him
for long, and was on uncommonly bad terms with him. M. Turgeniev was
a respectable man, rich, famous, and held in wide esteem. Dostoevsky
summoned up all his courage, or rather, he succumbed to a kind of
giddiness, to a mysterious and awful attraction. Picture Turgeniev’s
comfortable study: the author himself at his desk.--The bell rings.--A
manservant announces Fyodor Dostoevsky.--What is his business?--He is
shown in, and at once begins to tell his tale.--Turgeniev listens, dumb
with stupefaction. What business of his is all this? No doubt the other
man is mad!--After the confession, a great silence. Dostoevsky waits
for some word or sign from Turgeniev, believing no doubt that like in
his own novels, Turgeniev will take him in his arms, kiss him and weep
over him, and be reconciled ... but nothing happens:
“Monsieur Turgeniev, I must tell you how deeply I despise myself....”
He pauses again.... The silence remains unbroken until Dostoevsky,
unable to contain himself any longer, bursts out in wrath: “But _you_ I
despise even more! That’s all I wanted to say to you,” and off he goes,
slamming the door behind him.
Here we see how humility is suddenly displaced by a very different
feeling. The man who in his humility was abasing himself, draws up
in revolt at the humiliation. Humility opens the gates of Heaven:
humiliation the gates of Hell. Humility implies a measure of free-will
submission; it is accepted without constraint and proves the truth of
the Gospel teaching: “_For whosoever exalteth himself shall be abased:
and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted._” Humiliation, on the
other hand, degrades the soul, warping and deforming it; it irritates,
impoverishes, and blights, inflicting a moral hurt most ill to heal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account