Dr. Lavendar's PeopleDeland, Margaret Wade Campbell
General
Dr. Lavendar's People
Deland, Margaret Wade Campbell
Clergy -- Fiction; Pennsylvania -- Fiction; United States -- Social life and customs -- Fiction; Villages -- Fiction
But in spite of Dr. Lavendar's optimism, it was a queer household,
according to Old Chester lights.... In the first place, the father and
mother were more unlike than is generally considered to be
matrimonially safe. Amelia was a dear, good soul, but, as Miss Helen
Hayes said once, "with absolutely no mind"; while Thomas Dilworth was
eminently level-headed, although very fond (so Mrs. Drayton said) of
female society. And it must be admitted that Thomas had more than once
caused his Milly a slight pang by such fondness. But at least he was
never conscious that he had done so--and Milly never told him. (But
Mrs. Drayton said that that was something she could not forgive in a
married gentleman. "My dear husband," said Mrs. Drayton, "has never
wandered from me, even in imagination.") Added to conjugal incongruity
was this indifference on the part of Thomas and his wife to the
training of the children. The three young Dilworths were allowed to
grow up exactly as they pleased. It had worked well enough with Mary
and Nancy, who were good girls, affectionate and sensible--so sensible
that Nancy, when she was eighteen, had practically taken the
housekeeping out of her mother's hands; and Mary, at sixteen, looked
out for herself and her affairs most successfully. With Edwin the
Dilworth system had not been so satisfactory. He was conceited (though
that is only to be expected of the male creature at nineteen) and
rather selfish; and he had an unlovely reserve, in which he was
strikingly unlike his father, who overflowed with confidences. This,
and other unlikeness, was, no doubt, the reason that there were
constant small differences between them. And Mrs. Dilworth--vague,
gentle soul!--was somehow unable to smooth the differences over as
successfully as most mothers do.
Now, smoothing things over is practically a profession to mothers of
families. But Milly Dilworth had never succeeded in it. In the first
place, she had no gift of words; the more she felt, the more
inexpressive she became; but, worst of all, she had, poor woman, not
the slightest sense of humor. Now, in dealing with husbands and
children (especially with husbands), though you have the tongues of
men--which are thought to be more restrained than those of women--and
though you have the gift of prophecy (a common gift of wives) and
understand all mysteries--say, of housekeeping--and though you give
your body to be used up and worn out for their sakes, yet all these
things profit you nothing if you have no sense of humor. And Milly
Dilworth had none.
That was why she could not understand.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account