Drainage Modifications and Glaciation in the Danbury Region Connecticut: State of Connecticut State Geological and Natural History Survey Bulletin No. 30Harvey, Ruth Sawyer
Science
Drainage Modifications and Glaciation in the Danbury Region Connecticut: State of Connecticut State Geological and Natural History Survey Bulletin No. 30
Harvey, Ruth Sawyer
Geology -- Connecticut; Glacial epoch
The first hypothesis, that the Still is the ancient channel of the
Housatonic, has been advocated by Professor Hobbs, who has stated:
"That the valley of the Still was formerly occupied by a large
stream is probable from its wide valley area.... The former
discharge of the waters of the Housatonic through the Still into
the Croton system, on the one hand, or into the Saugatuck on the
other, would require the assumption of extremely slight changes
only in the rock channels which now connect them.... To turn the
river (the Housatonic) from its course along the limestone
valley some obstruction or differential uplift within the river
basin may have been responsible. The former seems to be the more
probable explanation in view of the large accumulations of drift
material in the area south and west of Bethel and Danbury."
"The structural valleys believed to be present in the
crystalline rocks of the uplands due to post-Newark deformation
may well have directed the course of the Housatonic after it had
once deserted the limestone ... The deep gorge of the Housatonic
through which the river enters the uplands not only crosses the
first high ridge of gneiss in the rectilinear direction of one
of the fault series, but its precipitous walls show the presence
of minor planes of dislocation, along which the bottom of the
valley appears to have been depressed."[9]
The hypothesis proposed by Professor Hobbs and also the second and
third hypotheses here given involve the supposition of reversal of
drainage, and their validity rests on the probability that the stream
now occupying Still River valley formerly flowed southward. The first
and second hypotheses will be considered in the following section.
[Footnote 9: Hobbs, W. H., Still rivers of western Connecticut: Bull.
Geol. Soc. Am., vol. 13, pp. 17-26, 1901.]
EVIDENCE TO BE EXPECTED IF STILL RIVER HAS BEEN REVERSED
If Still River occupies the valley of a reversed stream, the following
physiographic features should be expected:
1. A valley with a continuous width corresponding to the size of the
ancient stream, or a valley comparatively narrow at the north and
broadening toward the south.
2. Tributary valleys pointing upstream with respect to the present
river.
3. The regional slope not in accord with the present course of the
river.
4. Extensive glacial filling and ponded waters in the region of the
present sources of Still River.
5. Strong glacial scouring at the northern end in default of a glacial
dam at the southern end of the valley, or to assist a dam in its work
of reversing the river. The evidence of glacial erosion would be a
U-shaped valley, overdeepening of the main valley, and tributaries
ungraded with respect to the main stream.
1. A VALLEY WIDE THROUGHOUT OR BROADENING TOWARD THE SOUTH
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account