Draining for Profit, and Draining for HealthWaring, George E. (George Edwin)
Science
Draining for Profit, and Draining for Health
Waring, George E. (George Edwin)
Drain-tiles; Drainage
Experience in England has shown that if the whole cost of water supply and
pipe sewers is, with its interest, divided over a period of thirty
years,—so that at the end of that time it should all be repaid,—the annual
charge would not be greater than the cost of keeping house-drains and
cess-pools pools clean. The General Board of Health state that "the
expense of cleansing the brick house-drains and cess-pools for four or
five years, would pay the expense of properly constructed water-closets
and pipe-drains, for the greater number of old premises."
[Fig. 49 - MODERN HOUSE DRAINAGE AND SEWERAGE.]
Fig. 49 - MODERN HOUSE DRAINAGE AND SEWERAGE.
One of the reports of this body, which has added more than any other
organization to the world’s knowledge on these subjects, closes with the
following:
"Conclusions obtained as to house drainage, and the sewerage and cleansing
of the sites of towns."
"That no population living amidst impurities, arising from the putrid
emanations from cess-pools, drains and sewers of deposit, can be healthy
or free from the attacks of devastating epidemics.
"That as a primary condition of salubrity, no ordure and town refuse can
be permitted to remain beneath or near habitations.
"That by no means can remedial operations be so conveniently,
economically, inoffensively, and quickly effected as by the removal of all
such refuse dissolved or suspended in water.
"That it has been subsequently proved by the operation of draining houses
with tubular drains, in upwards of 19,000 cases, and by the trial of more
than 200 miles of pipe sewers, that the practice of constructing large
brick or stone sewers for general town drainage, which detain matters
passing into them in suspension in water, which accumulate deposit, and
which are made large enough for men to enter them, and remove the deposit
by hand labor, without reference to the area to be drained, has been in
ignorance, neglect or perversion of the above recited principles.
"That while sewers so constructed are productive of great injury to the
public health, by the diffusion into houses and streets of the noxious
products of the decomposing matters contained in them, they are wasteful
from the increased expense of their construction and repair, and from the
cost of ineffectual efforts to keep them free from deposit.
"That the house-drains, made as they have heretofore been, of absorbent
brick or stone, besides detaining substances in suspension, accumulating
foul deposit, and being so permeable as to permit the escape of the liquid
and gaseous matters, are also false in principle and wasteful in the
expense of construction, cleansing and repair.
"That it results from the experience developed in these inquiries, that
improved tubular house-drains and sewers of the proper sizes,
inclinations, and material, detain and accumulate no deposit, emit no
offensive smells, and require no additional supplies of water to keep them
clear.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account