Drugs in literature -- Bibliography; Science fiction, American -- Bibliography; Science fiction, English -- Bibliography
_Soma_, in _Brave New World_, is implicitly condemned as an
opiate, a mind-luller, an instrument of repression. Huxley’s negative
outlook toward the drug is not, though, an expression of work-oriented
Puritan morality so much as a classic liberal-humanitarian distrust of
technology: the Huxley of 1932 plainly believed that mankind coddled by
drugs was something less than what mankind could be. The young Huxley
felt contempt for those who needed mechanical aids or who depended
on anything other than the force of their own intellects. Many years
later, however, a very different Huxley experienced the psychedelic
marvels of mescaline and LSD, which kindled in him strong esthetic
delight and something akin to spiritual ecstasy. When he next attempted
the fictional construction of a utopian commonwealth, in _Island_
(1962), his outlook on mind-altering drugs was far more sympathetic.
In this ideal state of the future one uses not the soporific _soma_
but the ecstasy-invoking _moksha_, a mind-expanding hallucinogen.
Concerning _moksha_ one character says, “Having had the misfortune to
be brought up in Europe, Murugan calls it dope and feels about it all
the disapproval that, by conditioned reflex, the dirty word evokes. We,
on the contrary, give the stuff good names—the _moksha_-medicine, the
reality-revealer, the truth-and-beauty pill. And we know, by direct
experience, that the good names are deserved.”[2] Huxley is really
talking about LSD, and his tone is that of the acid-evangelist.
—————————
[2] Huxley, Aldous. _Island._ New York: Harper and Row, Publishers,
1962. p. 157.
Drug as contemptible anodyne, drug as gateway to higher
reality—those are the poles bounding the handling of drugs in science
fiction. The older science fiction was preponderantly negative,
as, for example, James Gunn’s _The Joy Makers_, published in 1961
but written half a decade earlier, in which a repressive government
sustains itself through mandatory use of euphorics. The same theme can
be found in Hartley’s _Facial Justice_ (1960), and in other works. Even
when not used as an instrument of totalitarianism, drugs are often seen
as dangerous self-indulgence, as in Wellman’s _Dream-Dust from Mars_
(1938), Smith’s _Hellflower_ (1953), or Pohl’s _What to Do Until the
Analyst Comes_ (1956). The prototypes for the imaginary drugs described
in these stories are alcohol and heroin—drugs which blur the mind and
lower the consciousness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account