Education -- Early works to 1800; England -- Social life and customs -- Early works to 1800; Etiquette; Home economics -- Early works to 1800; Table
find meanings. Explanations and helps I shall gladly receive, in the
hope that they may appear in another volume of like kind for which I
trust soon to find more MSS. Of other MSS. of like kind I also ask for
notice.
The reason for reprinting Wynkyn de Worde’s _Boke of Keruynge_, which I
had not at first thought of, was because its identity of phrase and word
with many parts of Russell,--a thing which came on me with a curious
feeling of surprise as I turned over the leaves,--made it certain that
de Worde either abstracted in prose Russell’s MS., chopping off his
lines’ tails,--adding also bits here[14], leaving out others there,--or
else that both writers copied a common original. The most cursory
perusal will show this to be the case. It was not alone by happy chance
that when Russell had said
O Fruture viant / Fruter sawge byñ good /
bett{ur} is Frut{ur} powche;
Appulle fruture / is good hoot / but þe cold ye not towche
(l. 501-2)
Wynkyn de Worde delivered himself of
“Fruyter vaunte, fruyter say be good; better is fruyter pouche;
apple fruyters ben good good hote / and all colde fruters, touche
not,”
altering _not’s_ place to save the rhyme; or that when Russell had said
of the Crane
The Crane is a fowle / that strong{e} is w{i}t{h} to far{e};
þe whyng{es} ye areyse / full{e} large evyñ thar{e};
of hyr{e} trompe in þe brest / loke þ{a}t ye beware
Wynkyn de Worde directed his Carver thus: “A crane, reyse the wynges
fyrst, & beware of the trumpe in his brest.” Let any one compare the
second and third pages of Wynkyn de Worde’s text with lines 48-137 of
Russell, and he will make up his mind that the old printer was either
one of the most barefaced plagiarists that ever lived, or that the same
original was before him and Russell too. May Mr Davenport’s hayloft, or
some learned antiquarian, soon decide the alternative for us! The
question was too interesting a “Curiosity of Literature” not to be laid
before our Members, and therefore _The Boke of Keruynge_ was
reprinted--from the British Museum copy of the second edition of
1513--with added side-notes and stops, and the colophon as part of the
title.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account