See Chap. II. p. 107, _n._ 224. The best attested reading is
ἐποιήσατο, not ἐποίησεν, and ἐποιήσατο ἑαυτοῦ means “claimed as his
own.” The words ἐκλεξάμενος ταύτας τὰς συγγραφάς have been doubted
since the time of Schleiermacher, and Diels has now come to regard the
whole fragment as spurious. This is because it was used to prove that
Pythagoras wrote books (cf. Diels, _Arch._ iii. p. 451). As Mr.
Bywater has pointed out, however, the fragment itself makes no such
statement; it only says that he read books, which we may presume he
did. I would further suggest that the old-fashioned συγγραφάς is
rather too good for a forger, and that the omission of the very thing
to be proved is remarkable. The last suggestion of a book by
Pythagoras disappears with the reading ἐποιήσατο for ἐποίησεν. Of
course a late writer who read of Pythagoras making extracts from books
would assume that he put them into a book of his own, just as people
did in his own days. For the rest, I understand ἱστορίη of science,
which is contrasted with the κακοτεχνίη which Pythagoras derived from
the συγγραφαί of men like Pherekydes of Syros.
Footnote 336:
The word κόσμος must mean “world” here, not merely “order;” for only
the world could be identified with fire. This use of the word is
Pythagorean, and there is no reason to doubt that Herakleitos may have
known it.
Footnote 337:
It is important to notice that μέτρα is internal accusative with
ἁπτόμενον, “with its measures kindling and its measures going out.”
Footnote 338:
On the word πρηστήρ, see below, p. 165, _n._ 380.
Footnote 339:
The subject of fr. 23 is γῆ, as we see from Diog. ix. 9 (R. P. 36),
πάλιν τε αὖ τὴν γὴν χεῖσθαι; and Aet. i. 3, 11 (_Dox._ p. 284 a 1; b
5), ἔπειτα ἀναχαλωμένην τὴν γῆν ὑπὸ τοῦ τυρὸς χύσει (Dübner: φύσει,
libri) ὕδωρ ἀποτελεῖσθαι. Herakleitos might quite well say γῆ θάλασσα
διαχέεται, and the context in Clement (_Strom._ v. p. 712) seems to
imply this. The phrase μετρέεται εἰς τὸν αὐτὸν λόγον can only mean
that the proportion of the measures remains constant. So practically
Zeller (p. 690, n. 1), _zu derselben Grösse_.
Footnote 340:
With Diels I adopt the transposition (proposed by Tocco) of ἀέρος and
γῆς.
Footnote 341:
I understand ἐπελθόν of the πυρὸς ἔφοδος, for which see below, p. 168.
Diels has pointed out that καταλαμβάνειν is the old word for “to
convict.” It is, literally, “to overtake,” just as αἱρεῖν is “to
catch.”
Footnote 342:
In this fragment it is clear that οὖρος = τέρματα, and therefore means
“boundary,” not “hill.” As αἴθριος Ζεύς means the bright blue sky, I
do not think its οὖρος can be the South Pole, as Diels says. It is
more likely the horizon. I am inclined to take the fragment as a
protest against the Pythagorean theory of a southern hemisphere.
Footnote 343:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account