Three different positions of the equinox are given in three different
Babylonian tablets, namely, 10°, 8° 15′, and 8° 0′ 30″ of Aries.
(Kugler, _Mondrechnung_, p. 103; Ginzel, _Klio_, i. p. 205.) Given
knowledge of this kind, and the practice of formulating recurrences in
cycles, it is scarcely conceivable that the Babylonians should not
have invented a cycle for precession. It is equally intelligible that
they should only have reached a rough approximation; for the
precessional period is really about 27,600 years and not 36,000. It is
to be observed that Plato’s “perfect year” is also 36,000 solar years
(Adam’s _Republic_, vol. ii. p. 302), and that it is probably
connected with the precession of the equinoxes. (Cf. _Tim._ 39 d, a
passage which is most easily interpreted if referred to precession.)
This suggestion as to the origin of the “Great Year” was thrown out by
Mr. Adam (_op. cit._ p. 305), and is now confirmed by Hilprecht, _The
Babylonian Expedition of the University of Pennsylvania_
(Philadelphia, 1906).
We shall see that Thales probably knew the cycle which the Babylonians
used to predict eclipses (§ 3); but it would be a mistake to suppose
that the pioneers of Greek science had any detailed knowledge of the
Babylonian astronomy. It was not till the time of Plato that even the
names of the planets were known,[40] and the recorded observations were
only made available in Alexandrian times. But, even if they had known
these, their originality would remain. The Babylonians studied and
recorded celestial phenomena for what we call astrological purposes, not
from any scientific interest. There is no evidence at all that their
accumulated observations ever suggested to them the least
dissatisfaction with the primitive view of the world, or that they
attempted to account for what they saw in any but the crudest way. The
Greeks, on the other hand, with far fewer data to go upon, made at least
three discoveries of capital importance in the course of two or three
generations. In the first place, they discovered that the earth is a
sphere and does not rest on anything. In the second place, they
discovered the true theory of lunar and solar eclipses; and, in close
connexion with this, they came to see, in the third place, that the
earth is not the centre of our system, but revolves round it like the
other planets. Not very much later, certain Greeks even took, at least
tentatively, the final step of identifying the centre round which the
earth and the planets revolve with the sun. These discoveries will be
discussed in their proper place; they are only mentioned here to show
the gulf between Greek astronomy and everything that had preceded it.
The Babylonians had as many thousand years as the Greeks had centuries
to make these discoveries, and it does not appear that they ever thought
of one of them. The originality of the Greeks cannot be successfully
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account