III. In one respect the way had been prepared already. Long before
history begins, the colonisation of the islands and the coasts of Asia
Minor had brought about a state of things that was not favourable to the
rigid maintenance of traditional customs and ways of thought. A myth is
essentially a local thing, and though the emigrants might give the names
of ancestral sanctuaries to similar spots in their new homes, they could
not transfer with the names the old sentiment of awe. Besides, these
were, on the whole, stirring and joyful times. The spirit of adventure
is not favourable to superstition, and men whose chief occupation is
fighting are not apt to be oppressed by that “fear of the world” which
some tell us is the normal state of the savage mind. Even the savage
becomes in great measure free from it when he is really happy.
[Sidenote: 1. Homer.]
That is why we find so few traces of the primitive view of the world in
Homer. The gods have become frankly human, and everything savage is, so
far as may be, kept out of sight. There are, of course, vestiges of
early beliefs and practices, but they are exceptional. In that strange
episode of the Fourteenth Book of the _Iliad_ known as _The Deceiving of
Zeus_ we find a number of theogonical ideas which are otherwise quite
foreign to Homer, but they are treated with so little seriousness that
the whole thing has even been regarded as a parody or burlesque of some
primitive poem on the birth of the gods. That, however, is to mistake
the spirit of Homer. He finds the old myth ready to his hand, and sees
in it matter for a “joyous tale,” just as Demodokos did in the loves of
Ares and Aphrodite. There is no antagonism to traditional views, but
rather a complete detachment from them.
It has often been noted that Homer never speaks of the primitive custom
of purification for bloodshed. The dead heroes are burned, not buried,
as the kings of continental Hellas were. Ghosts play hardly any part. In
the _Iliad_ we have, to be sure, the ghost of Patroklos, in close
connexion with the solitary instance of human sacrifice in Homer. All
that was part of the traditional story, and Homer says as little about
it as he can. There is also the _Nekyia_ in the Eleventh Book of the
_Odyssey_, which has been assigned to a late date on the ground that it
contains Orphic ideas. The reasoning does not appear cogent. As we shall
see, the Orphics did not so much invent new ideas as revive old ones,
and if the legend took Odysseus to the abode of the dead, that had to be
described in accordance with the accepted views about it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account