The Richter Scale, named after Dr. Charles F. Richter of the California
Institute of Technology, is the best known scale for measuring the
magnitude of earthquakes. The scale is logarithmic so that a recording
of 7, for example, indicates a disturbance with ground motion 10 times
as large as a recording of 6. A quake of magnitude 2 is the smallest
quake normally felt by people. Earthquakes with a Richter value of 6 or
more are commonly considered major; great earthquakes have magnitudes of
8 or more on the Richter scale.
The Modified Mercalli Scale expresses the intensity of an earthquake’s
effects in a given locality in values ranging from I to XII. The most
commonly used adaptation covers the range of intensity from the
condition of “I—Not felt except by a very few under especially favorable
conditions,” to “XII—Damage total. Lines of sight and level are
distorted. Objects thrown upward into the air.” Evaluation of earthquake
intensity can be made only after eyewitness reports and results of field
investigations are studied and interpreted. The maximum intensity
experienced in the Alaska earthquake of 1964 was X; damage from the San
Francisco and New Madrid earthquakes reached a maximum intensity of XI.
[Illustration: _The January 17, 1994, earthquake at Northridge,
California, caused this collapse of a major highway interchange._
(Photograph by James W. Dewey, USGS.)]
Earthquakes of large magnitude do not necessarily cause the most intense
surface effects. The effect in a given region depends to a large degree
on local surface and subsurface geologic conditions. An area underlain
by unstable ground (sand, clay, or other unconsolidated materials), for
example, is likely to experience much more noticeable effects than an
area equally distant from an earthquake’s epicenter but underlain by
firm ground such as granite. In general, earthquakes east of the Rocky
Mountains affect a much larger area than earthquakes west of the
Rockies.
An earthquake’s destructiveness depends on many factors. In addition to
magnitude and the local geologic conditions, these factors include the
focal depth, the distance from the epicenter, and the design of
buildings and other structures. The extent of damage also depends on the
density of population and construction in the area shaken by the quake.
The Loma Prieta earthquake of 1989 demonstrated a wide range of effects.
The Santa Cruz mountains suffered little damage from the seismic waves,
even though they were close to the epicenter. The central core of the
city of Santa Cruz, about 24 kilometers (15 miles) away from the
epicenter, was almost completely destroyed. More than 80 kilometers (50
miles) away, the cities of San Francisco and Oakland suffered selective
but severe damage, including the loss of more than 40 lives. The
greatest destruction occurred in areas where roads and elevated
structures were built on unstable ground underlain by loose,
unconsolidated soils.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account