East-West Trade Trends: Mutual Defense Assistance Control Act of 1951 (the Battle Act); Fourth Report to Congress, Second Half of 1953United States. Foreign Operations Administration
History
East-West Trade Trends: Mutual Defense Assistance Control Act of 1951 (the Battle Act); Fourth Report to Congress, Second Half of 1953
United States. Foreign Operations Administration
Military assistance; Mutual security program, 1951-; United States -- Commercial policy
III. THE KREMLIN'S RECENT TRADING ACTIVITIES 19
The New Trade Agreements
More Consumer Goods Ordered
A Shopping Spree for Ships
Most of All, They Want Hard Goods
Something Different in Soviet Exports
They Have Dug Up Manganese
The Emergence of Russian Oil
Gold Sales Expanded
Reaching Outside Europe
IV. WHAT'S BEHIND IT ALL 35
The Kremlin and Peace
A Mixture of Motives
Their Objectives Haven't Changed
Their Practices Haven't Changed
The Free World Is Strong
The Challenge
V. U. S. POLICY ON STRATEGIC TRADE CONTROLS 43
The Background
Basic Policy Reaffirmed
The New Direction of Policy
Reviewing the Control Lists
East-West Trade: Road to Peace
Trade Within the Free World
The China Trade Falls Off
They Play by Their Own Rules
United States Policy on the China Trade
VI. THE BATTLE ACT AND ECONOMIC DEFENSE 55
Battle Act Functions
The Money and the Manpower
Meshing the Gears
Improving the Machinery
The Termination-of-Aid Provision
Miscellaneous Activities
Summary of the Report
APPENDICES
A. TRADE CONTROLS OF FREE WORLD COUNTRIES 65
B. STATISTICAL TABLES 89
C. TEXT OF BATTLE ACT 99
CHARTS
1. VOLUME OF TRADE OF OEEC COUNTRIES WITH
EUROPEAN SOVIET BLOC 6
2. FREE WORLD TRADE WITH THE SOVIET BLOC 21
3. EDAC STRUCTURE 57
_INTRODUCTION_
=Note on "Strategic" and "Nonstrategic"=
To help protect the security of the free world, the United States and
certain other countries have been working together for more than four
years to withhold strategic goods from the Soviet bloc.
But how can you tell strategic goods from nonstrategic goods? A good
many people have asked that question. It is a reasonable question and
it deserves a nontechnical answer.
The answer is that strategic goods, as understood in the day-to-day
operations of the program, are those goods which would make a
significant contribution to the warmaking power of the Soviet bloc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account