Easy lessons in Einstein : $b A discussion of the more intelligible features of the theory of relativitySlosson, Edwin E. (Edwin Emery)
Science
Easy lessons in Einstein : $b A discussion of the more intelligible features of the theory of relativity
Slosson, Edwin E. (Edwin Emery)
Einstein, Albert, 1879-1955; Relativity (Physics)
_The Author_: Well, definitions of insanity are so uncertain that
it is not safe to say who is crazy. But it seems there’s method in his
madness--otherwise how could he have hit upon the exact extent of the
sun’s attraction on light?
_The Reader_: (Picks up his paper and reads aloud with
concentrated attention) “Postulate I. Every law of nature which holds
good with respect to a coördinate system K must also hold good for
any other system K′, provided that K and K′ are in uniform movement of
translation.” Say, do you know anything about this business?
_The Author_: Well, yes, a little. I have followed the
controversy--at a safe distance--for a number of years.
_The Reader_: Can you tell me in plain language what it is all
about?
_The Author_: Yes. Just that. I can tell you what it is
_about_, though I can’t tell you what it _is_. Einstein says
that there are only twelve men in the world capable of understanding
his latest paper.
_The Reader_: Are you one of the twelve?
_The Author_: No, nor the thirteenth. But without plunging into
the mathematics of it, we might talk over some of the interesting
aspects of the theory of relativity and in the end I could put you on
track of the twelve so you could read up on the subject if you liked.
_The Reader_: All right. That’s fair. This is a slow car anyhow.
Go ahead.
_The Author_: (See following pages)--
EASY LESSONS IN EINSTEIN
“_A warp in nature has been found,_
_No line is straight, no circle round;_
_For Isaac Newton had unsound_
_Ideas of gravitation._”
Why is it that our newspapers are sending out their reporters to
interview astronomers as well as actresses and devoting pages to
speculations on the nature of space and time as well as on the state
of the market? It is--to get at the bottom of it--merely because a few
photographs taken during the eclipse of the sun on May 29, 1919, by
two telescopes, one at Sobral in northern Brazil and the other on the
island of Principe off the west coast of Africa, showed an abnormal
shift of less than one-324,000th of a right angle in the position of
the stars. When these photograph films were laid over films taken
before the eclipse it was found that the star-images about the darkened
disk of the sun did not exactly coincide with the images when the sun
was not in their midst. Measured with a micrometer the displacement of
the stars from their ordinary positions was found to be 1.60 seconds of
arc on the African plates and 1.98 seconds on the Brazilian plates.
Average these two observations and you get 1.79. This is extremely
close to the 1.73 predicted by Professor Einstein of Berlin and twice
as large as the deflection calculated according to Newton’s law of
gravitation which would be .87 of a second.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account