Easy lessons in Einstein : $b A discussion of the more intelligible features of the theory of relativitySlosson, Edwin E. (Edwin Emery)
Science
Easy lessons in Einstein : $b A discussion of the more intelligible features of the theory of relativity
Slosson, Edwin E. (Edwin Emery)
Einstein, Albert, 1879-1955; Relativity (Physics)
Such playful flights of the scientific imagination as Wells and
Flammarion indulge in and such freaks of projection as the camera
man amuses us with are of use to those of us who find difficulty
in translating a mathematical formula into terms of everyday life.
There is no better place to study metaphysics than in the world of
the flickering screen, for there man has complete control of time and
space. He can enlarge and reduce any object. He can hasten, retard
or reverse any action. He can throw upon the screen at the same time
events happening months and miles apart. Therefore to those of us
who have had the advantage of an education in the movies, Einstein’s
ideas of the relativity of time and space do not seem startling or
inconceivable.
Kant not only conceived the possibility of more than three dimensions
but believed in the probability of it. His argument is based on greater
insight into the intentions of the Almighty than we of this day would
claim:
“If it is _possible_ that there be developments of other
dimensions in space, it is also very _probable_ that God has
somewhere produced them. For His works have all the grandeur and
variety that can possibly be conceived.”
In this temporal, spatial and material world of ours reality requires
that the four dimensions should hang together. But at an infinite
distance from all matter this fourfold combination would be dissolved
into a three-dimensional space and a one-dimensional time. In that
extra-mundane realm time ceases to flow, gravitation no longer drags
downward, matter is non-existent, light is immovable and change is
impossible.[3] Thus the new mathematics leads to a state curiously
like the conventional conception of heaven.
We talk as our forefathers did about “the ends of the earth” but
we know that one might start from his home and walk forever in any
direction without coming to an end of it. But though the earth’s
surface is infinite in the sense of endless, yet one never can get more
than 8,000 miles away from home where’er he may roam. If a man stood
on the top of the highest mountain on earth and aimed a level gun in
any direction, the bullet, if it could be given sufficient velocity to
counteract the influence of gravity, would go around the world and hit
him in the back of the head. Or if light were sufficiently deflected
by gravitation to follow a level line around the earth--another absurd
assumption--the man looking through a level telescope in any direction
could see how his hair was combed in the back. Such happenings, though
impossible, are not inconceivable but are logical consequences of our
knowledge that the world is round and that what we call straight or
level lines as measured on plain or sea are really great circles around
a center four thousand miles below.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account