Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 2—The Church of the CommonwealthStoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 2—The Church of the Commonwealth
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
The Presbyterians, immediately after Pride's purge, lost their place in
the government of this country, upon which the political Independents
at once assumed supremacy in the State. Of the old ecclesiastical
reformers who belonged to that party, and had made themselves
conspicuous in the year 1641, the chief now remaining in power were
Oliver Cromwell, Sir Henry Vane,[1] Henry Marten, Oliver St. John, and
Sir Arthur Haselrig; and these remarkable men all took their seats
at the table of the new Council of State, being installed as members
of it in the month of February, 1649. The other persons occupying
places beside them were nothing more than satellites. Neither St.
John nor Haselrig held any leading position. The former was more a
lawyer than a statesman, and his cold nature and reserved disposition
gave him neither influence with his equals nor popularity with his
inferiors. Haselrig was no less distinguished by his rashness. Having
been simply a follower of Pym, he had not, since his master's death,
acquired sufficient influence to make himself a leader; and his want of
judgment, though it did not exclude him from the council board, left
him without much weight in its deliberations.
[Sidenote: _Cromwell, Vane, and Marten._]
Vane, Cromwell, and Marten, therefore, were now the English
_triumvirate_. Vane and Marten were staunch republicans. Staunch
republicans they had been from the beginning. How far Cromwell was
really so--whether indeed he ever could be considered one at all--are
questions on which much may be said; but at any rate, the government
which he now joined was republican in fact, and to that government,
for the present, the majority of Englishmen felt compelled to submit.
The patriotism of the new rulers cannot be fairly questioned. The
vulgar notion of their selfish ambition appears, when we consider the
circumstances in which they were placed, little short of an absurdity;
yet there can be no doubt that the majority of the people did not
sympathize with them, but only tolerated for a season what they could
not altogether prevent.
[Sidenote: 1649, February.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account