Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]Stoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
Although Barrow does not copiously discuss the doctrine of the
Atonement--although he dwells chiefly on the moral effects of
Christ’s death--yet he uses very strong expressions as to the effect
of our Lord’s sacrifice upon the Divine government, speaking of it
as “appeasing that wrath of God which He naturally beareth toward
iniquity, and reconciling God to men, who by sin were alienated
from Him, by procuring a favourable disposition and intentions of
grace toward us.” “Christ died, removing thereby that just hatred
and displeasure.” “The non-imputation of our sins is expressed as
a singular effect, an instance, an argument of His being in mind
reconciled and favourably disposed towards us.”[432]
In five sermons, entirely devoted to the subject, this Divine asserts
and explains the doctrine of universal redemption, saying that
salvation is made attainable, and is really tendered unto all, upon
feasible and equal conditions; and that a competency of grace is
imparted to every man, qualifying him to do what God requires.[433]
His account of the Divinity and personality of the Holy Spirit is the
same as is generally given by orthodox teachers. As to the work of the
third Person in the Trinity, Barrow’s line of thought coincides more
with Anglican than with Puritan writers. Besides much of a general
character upon the Spirit’s assistance, in the thirty-fourth sermon
on the Creed, Barrow remarks--“It hath been the doctrine constantly
with general consent delivered in and by the Catholic Church, that
to all persons by the holy mystery of baptism duly initiated into
Christianity, and admitted into the communion of Christ’s body, the
grace of the Holy Spirit is communicated, enabling them to perform the
conditions of piety and virtue which they undertake.”[434]
Barrow appears to have been a Low Churchman, and, in the fragment he
has left us upon “the holy Catholic Church,” omits those assertions
respecting ecclesiastical authority which were the joy of Thorndike and
Heylyn. He explains the different senses in which the word “Church”
is used in the New Testament; and, in its larger sense, applies to
it the epithets “holy” and “Catholic,” winding up all he has to say
with practical remarks which commend themselves to candid Christians
of all denominations.[435] It may be added that, in his discourse
concerning _The unity of the Church_, he opposes the idea of any
such ecclesiastical authority as is contended for either by Papists or
Anglo-Catholics.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account