Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]Stoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
Fowler affirms that those who are sincerely righteous, and from an
inward living principle allow themselves in no known sin, nor in
the neglect of any known duty, which is to be truly, evangelically
righteous, shall be dealt with and rewarded, in and through Christ,
as if they were perfectly and in a strict legal sense so. Entering
essentially into Fowler’s notion of faith is the idea of its being the
germ of Christian virtue: and, as it regards the connection between
faith and justification, he believes that the receiving of Christ
as Lord is a prerequisite to the obtaining of Christ as Redeemer.
He defines justifying faith in these words:--“A grace of the Holy
Spirit, whereby a man being convinced of his sin and miserable estate
in regard of it, and an all-sufficiency in Christ to save from both,
receives Him as He is tendered in the Gospel, or according to his three
offices of Prophet, Priest, and King;” and,--which is important to
the understanding of Fowler’s views,--he adds, “That act of receiving
Christ as Lord, is to go before that of receiving Him as a Priest;
for we may not rely upon Him for salvation, till we are willing to
yield obedience to Him.”[474] In all this, and in much more, may
be recognized a striving after some way of thoroughly meeting the
two sides of that redemption from evil, which in the Gospel is ever
represented as one. Whilst some theologians made holiness the result
of faith in a Divine salvation, which salvation was treated by them
as identical with justification, and others considered holiness as
an essential part of it,--Fowler leaned in the direction of making
holiness the means of salvation; and the tendency to adopt a _via
media_ further appears in his attempt to steer a middle course
between Calvinism and Arminianism:--He remarks, “That there is such
a thing as distinguishing grace, whereby some persons are absolutely
elected, by virtue whereof they shall be (having potent and infallible
means prepared for them) irresistibly saved. But that others, that are
not in the number of those singular and special favourites, are not
at all in a desperate condition, but have sufficient means appointed
for them to qualify them for greater or less degrees of happiness, and
have sufficient grace offered to them some way or other, and some time
or other; and are in a capacity of salvation either greater or less,
through the merits of Jesus Christ; and that none of them are damned,
but those that wilfully refuse to co-operate with that grace of God,
and will not act in some moral suitableness to that power they have
received.”[475]
[Sidenote: FOWLER.]
Universal redemption,--by which is signified the universal
applicability of our Lord’s atoning sacrifice,--is strenuously
maintained by this Divine;[476] and he speaks hopefully of the future
state, through Christ, of virtuous heathens.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account