Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 5—The Church of the RevolutionStoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 5—The Church of the Revolution
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
The fourth important meeting of this kind took place on November the
6th, when the Archbishop, and the Bishops of London, Rochester, and
Peterborough, made their appearance in the Sovereign’s presence; the
Bishop of St. David’s--throughout an object of suspicion--“waiting for
them in the Guard-chamber, ready to thrust in with them to the King.”
The Primate, taking Lord Preston aside, requested him to procure for
them a private audience; upon which the King, through his Lordship,
ordered the obnoxious and forward Prelate to withdraw. The rest told
James they had done all they could, and that if he were satisfied,
they did not care for other people’s opinions; but when he talked to
them of such a paper as he had required, they fell back on the ground
they had occupied before, that scarcely one in five hundred believed
in the genuineness of the document published in the Prince’s name. The
Archbishop did not touch the question of the paper so much wished for
by James, although one had been drawn up, and signed by himself; most
probably the reason of this omission was, that he could not carry his
brethren with him in the matter, and he felt it would not do for him
to make a solitary disavowal on the subject. Presently the dispute
wandered into a confused maze, and the Archbishop could not help
adverting to the treatment which he and his six brethren had received
at the Royal hands. The King was annoyed, but the Primate persevered;
the rest supported him, and His Majesty stood like a stag at bay. James
retorted that if they complained, he had a right to complain too, and
the quarrel became unseemly in the extreme. Indeed, His Majesty was
now beginning to find that whatsoever a man soweth that shall he also
reap, and as he had by his lawyers bearded the Bishops in his own
Court at Westminster, the Bishops in return were bearding him in his
own Palace of Whitehall. The conversation came round to the old point.
James wanted them to sign a paper. They would not. “I am your King,” he
said; “I am judge what is best for me. I will go my own way; I desire
your assistance in it.” Go his own way he might, but they would not
go with him. Whatever their high notions of Royal prerogatives, and
the obligations of subjects, might have been once, the recent trial
had wonderfully opened the eyes of their understanding. They would not
take on themselves the responsibility of publishing any disclaimer. His
Majesty might publish to the world what they had said, if he liked.[39]
“No,” said he; “if I should publish it, the people would not believe
me.” Not believe him? The confession was most humiliating. “Sir,” said
the right reverend father, “the word of a King is sacred--it ought to
be believed.” “They that could believe me guilty of a false son, what
will they not believe of me?” was the bitter rejoinder. James’ credit
had sunk as low as it could. Further talking was useless. “I will urge
you no further,” said he, in conclusion. “If you will not assist me as
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account