Eclectic Magazine of Foreign Literature, Science, and Art, April 1885Various
General
Eclectic Magazine of Foreign Literature, Science, and Art, April 1885
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Literature -- Periodicals
This is not much better, however, than trifling. I dare say that if
a lively Frenchman could have watched the inspired Pythia on the
sublime tripod, he would have cried, _Elle s’écoute quand elle parle_.
When everything of that kind has been said, we have the profound
satisfaction, which is not quite a matter of course in the history of
literature, of finding, after all that the woman and the writer were
one. The life does not belie the books, nor private conduct stultify
public profession. We close the third volume of the biography, as we
have so often closed the third volume of her novels, feeling to the
very core that in spite of a style that the French call _alambiqué_, in
spite of tiresome double and treble distillations of phraseology, in
spite of fatiguing moralities, gravities, and ponderosities, we have
still been in communion with a high and commanding intellect, and a
great nature. We are vexed by pedantries that recall the _précieuses_
of the Hôtel Rambouillet, but we know that she had the soul of the
most heroic women in history. We crave more of the Olympian serenity
that makes action natural and repose refreshing, but we cannot miss
the edification of a life marked by indefatigable labor after generous
purposes, by an unsparing struggle for duty, and by steadfast and
devout fellowship with lofty thoughts.
Those who know Mr. Myers’s essay on George Eliot will not have
forgotten its most imposing passage:—
“I remember how at Cambridge, I walked with her once in the Fellows’
Garden of Trinity, on an evening of rainy May; and she, stirred
somewhat beyond her wont, and taking as her text the three words
which have been used so often as the inspiring trumpet-calls of
men.—the words _God_, _Immortality_, _Duty_,—pronounced, with terrible
earnestness, how inconceivable was the _first_, how unbelievable the
_second_, and yet how peremptory and absolute the _third_. Never,
perhaps, had sterner accents affirmed the sovereignty of impersonal
and unrecompensing law. I listened, and night fell; her grave,
majestic countenance turned toward me like a Sibyl’s in the gloom; it
was as though she withdrew from my grasp, one by one, the two scrolls
of promise, and left me the third scroll only, awful with inevitable
fates.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account