Economics is the name which people have come to give to the study of
Wealth. It is the study by which we learn how Wealth is produced, how
it is consumed, how it is distributed among people, and so on. It is a
very important kind of study, because it often depends upon our being
right or wrong in Economics whether we make the whole State poorer or
richer, and whether we make the people living in the State happier or
not.
Now as Economics is the study of Wealth, the first thing we have to
make certain of is, _What Wealth is_.
I
WHAT IS WEALTH?
The Economic definition of Wealth is subtle and difficult to
appreciate, but it is absolutely essential to our study to get it clear
at the outset and keep it firmly in mind. It is through some muddlement
in this original definition of wealth that nearly all mistakes in
Economics are made.
First, we must be clear as to what Wealth is _not_.
Wealth is never properly defined, for the purposes of economic study,
by any one of the answers a person would naturally give off-hand. For
instance, most people would say that a man’s wealth was the money he
was worth. But that, of course, is nonsense; for even if there were no
money used his possessions would still be there, and if he had a house
and cattle and horses the mere fact that money was not being used where
he lived would not make him any worse off.
Another and better, but still a wrong, answer is: “Wealth is what a man
possesses.”
For instance, in the case of this farmer, his house and his stock and
his furniture and implements are what we call his “wealth.” In ordinary
talk that answer will do well enough. But it will not do for the
strict science of Economics, for it is not accurate.
For consider a particular case. Part of this man’s wealth is, you
say, a certain grey horse. But if you look closely at your definition
and make it rigidly accurate, you will find that _it is not the horse
itself which constitutes his wealth, but something attaching to the
horse_, some quality or circumstance which affects the horse and gives
the horse what is called its _value_. It is this _Value_ which is
wealth, not the horse. To see how true this is consider how the value
changes while the horse remains the same.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account