This is one of the very worst things that has happened on account of
the war, for as the money now being used all over Europe is not real
money, no one feels certain whether he can get his debts really paid,
or whether his savings are safe, or whether a contract made for a
certain payment a few months hence will be really fulfilled or not. A
man may lend a thousand francs or marks or pounds for a year, and then
at the end of the year, when he is to be paid back, he may be paid in
coin which has got so much worse that he is really receiving only half
or a tenth or a thousandth of the real value he lent. A man in Germany
sells a hundred sheep for so many marks, to be paid for in a month; and
at the end of the month the marks will only buy ten sheep!
This piece of swindling, which has been the note of the last five
years, is the first point we have touched on so far where a problem in
Economics and the study of economic law brings one up against questions
of right and wrong.
It is morally wrong for the Government to swindle people out of their
property by making false money. What is the way out, allowing for
Economic Law? It is morally wrong that some men should starve while
other men have too much: allowing for Economic Law, what is the way out
of such evils?
As you go on in the study of Economics you find quantities of questions
where you have to decide whether economic laws render possible
political actions which you would very much like to undertake, and
which seem right and just. Many such actions, though one would like to
undertake them, cannot be undertaken because our study of Economics
has shown us that the consequences will be very different from what we
hoped.
On the other hand, a great many people try to get out of what it is
their duty to do politically by pleading that Economic Law prevents it.
Before ending these notes, then, we must go into the main questions
of this kind, and see what there is to be said, in the light of
economic knowledge, for our present system of society, which is called
=Capitalism=; for other systems in the past such as =Slavery=; for
=Private Property=; for the various theories of =Socialism=; for and
against =Usury=, and so on.
It is necessary to go into these points even in the most elementary
book on Economics, because the moment one begins the practical
application of one’s economic science these questions at once arise; to
answer them rightly is the most important use we can make of economic
knowledge.
Part II
POLITICAL APPLICATIONS
INTRODUCTION
So far I have been putting down the elements of Economics just as one
might put down the elements of Arithmetic. But Economics have, just
like Arithmetic, a _practical application_: if it were not for this,
there would be no real use in studying Economics at all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account