We must carefully note that wealth thus defined is NOT the same thing
as well-being. The mixing up of these two separate things--well-being
and economic wealth--has given rise to half the errors in economic
science. People confuse the word “wealth” with the idea of well-being.
They say: “Surely a man is better off with plenty of water than with
little, and therefore conditions under which he can get plenty of water
for nothing are conditions under which he has _more wealth_ than when
he has to pay for it. He has more _wealth_ when he gets the water free
than he has when he has to pay for it.”
It is not so. Economic wealth is a separate thing from well-being.
Economic wealth may well be increasing though the general well-being of
the people is going down. It may increase though the general well-being
of the people around it is stationary.
The Science of Economics does not deal with true happiness nor even
with well-being in material things. It deals with a strictly limited
field of what is called “Economic Wealth,” and if it goes outside its
own boundaries it goes wrong. Making people as happy as possible is
much more than Economics can pretend to. Economics cannot even tell
you how to make people well-to-do in material things. But it can tell
you how exchangeable Wealth is produced and what happens to it; and as
it can tell you this, it is a useful servant.
That is the second difficult point at the very beginning of our study.
_Economic Wealth consists in_ EXCHANGEABLE _values, and nothing else_.
We must be as clear on this second point as we have made ourselves upon
the first, or we shall not make any progress in Economics. They are
both of them unfamiliar ideas, and one has to go over them many times
before one really grasps them. But they are absolutely essential to
this science.
Let us sum up this first, elementary, part of our subject, and put it
in the shortest terms we can find--what are called “Formulæ,” which
means short and exact definitions, such as can be learnt by heart and
retained permanently.
We write down, then, two Formulæ:
1. =Wealth is made up, not of things, but of economic values attaching
to things.=
2. =Wealth, for the purposes of economic study, means ONLY exchange
values: that is, values against which other values will be given in
exchange.=
II
THE THREE THINGS NECESSARY TO THE PRODUCTION OF WEALTH--LAND, LABOUR
AND CAPITAL
You will notice that all about you living beings are occupied in
changing the things around them from a condition where they are _less_
to a condition where they are _more_ useful to themselves.
Man is a living being, and he is doing this kind of thing all the time.
If he were not he could not live.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account