The great disadvantage of the slave-owning state is clearly apparent:
in it the mass of men are degraded: they are not citizens: they cannot
exercise their own wills. This is so evident and great an evil that it
must be set against all the advantages we are about to notice. Slavery
is a most unhappy condition in so far as it wounds human honour and
offends human dignity; and that is why the Christian religion gradually
dissolved slavery in the process of many centuries: slavery is not
sufficiently consistent with the idea of man’s being made in the image
of God. Slavery can also be materially unhappy, if the masters are
cruel or negligent. The great mass of slaves in such a society might
be, at the caprice of their masters, very unhappy; and under bad phases
of those societies they _were_ very unhappy.
But we must not be misled by the ideas that have grown up around the
word “slave” in the modern mind. Because we have no one in England
to-day who is called a slave and bought or sold as a slave, and no
one is yet compelled by law to work for another man, therefore we
regard slavery as something odd and alien; and because it is natural
to dislike things which are odd and alien, unaccustomed, we think of
slavery as something simply bad.
That is a great mistake. The Servile State had--and, if it comes back,
will have again--two great advantages: which were _personal security_
and _general stability_.
_Personal security_ means a condition in which everybody, master and
man, is free from grave anxiety upon the future: can expect regular
food and lodging and a continuance of his regular way of life.
_General stability_ means the continuance of all society in one
fashion, without the violent ups and downs of competition and without
the friction of unwilling, constantly interrupted labour--as in strikes
and lock-outs.
In the Servile State work always got done and was done regularly. The
owners knew “where they were.” With so much land and so many slaves
they were sure of a certain average annual produce. On the whole it was
to the advantage of a man to keep his slaves alive and fairly well fed
and housed. Also, the human relation came in, and a man and his slave,
in the better and simpler forms of the Servile State, would often be
friends and were usually in the same relation as people are to-day with
their dependents. For instance: in well-to-do houses of the Servile
State we know from history that certain slaves were often the tutors of
the children, and thus had a very important and respectable position,
and there were other slaves who acted as good musicians and architects
and artists. There was always the feeling of a fixed social difference
between slave and free, but this did not necessarily nor perhaps
usually lead to great unhappiness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account