The first secession from the National Presbyterian Church of Scotland,
as established at the Revolution, was in 1733, when differences on
account of matters of administration, rather than any difference of
theological doctrine, led to the foundation by Ebenezer Erskine of the
dissenting communion called _The Associate Presbytery_ or _Secession
Church_. In 1747 this communion split itself, on the question of the
obligation of the members to take a certain civil oath, called The
Burgher’s Oath, into two portions, calling themselves respectively the
_Associate_ or _Burgher Synod_ and the _General Associate_ or
_Anti-Burgher Synod_. The former in 1799 sent off a detachment from
itself called the _Original Burgher Synod_ or _Old Light Burghers_,
the main body remaining as the _Associate Burgher Synod_; and it was
to the second that Carlyle’s parents belonged, their pastor in
Ecclefechan being that Rev. Mr. Johnston to whose memory Carlyle has
paid such a tribute of respect, and whose grave is now to be seen in
Ecclefechan churchyard, near Carlyle’s own.
Footnote 15:
This is not the first passage at arms on record between a Carlyle and
an Irving. As far back as the sixteenth century, when Irvings and
Carlyles were even more numerous in the West Border than they are at
present, and are heard of, with Maxwells, Bells, Johnstons, and other
clans, as keeping those parts in continual turmoil with their feuds,
raids, and depredations, it would happen sometimes that a Carlyle
jostled with an Irving. Thus, in the Register of the Privy Council of
Scotland, under date Aug. 28, 1578, we have the statement from an
Alexander Carlyle that there had been a controversy “betwix him and
Johnne Irvin, callit the Windie Duke.” What the controversy was does
not appear; but both parties had been apprehended by Lord Maxwell,
then Warden of the West Marches, and lodged in the “pledge-chalmer,”
or prison, of Dumfries; and Carlyle’s complaint is that, while the
said John Irving had been released on bail, no such favour has been
shown to _him_, but he has been kept in irons for twenty-two weeks.
This Alexander Carlyle seems to be the same person as a “Red Alexander
Carlyle of Eglisfechan” heard of afterwards in the same Record, under
date Feb. 22, 1581–2, as concerned in “some attemptatis and slauchter”
committed in the West March, and of which the Privy Council were
taking cognisance. On this occasion he is not in controversy with an
Irving, but has “Edward Irving of Boneschaw,” and his son “Christie
Irving of the Coif,” among his fellow-culprits. Notices of the
Dumfriesshire Carlyles and Irvings, separately or in company, are
frequent in the Register through the reign of James VI.
Footnote 16:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account