Education; Educational psychology; Moral education
In previous chapters, we have considered the education in character and
knowledge which, in a good social system, should be open to everybody,
and should in fact be enjoyed by everybody, except for serious special
reasons such as musical genius. (It would have been unfortunate if
Mozart had been obliged to learn ordinary school subjects up to the age
of eighteen.) But even in an ideal community there would, I think, be
many people who would not go to the university. I am convinced that, at
present, only a minority of the population can profit by a scholastic
education prolonged to the age of twenty-one or twenty-two. Certainly
the idle rich who at present infest the older universities very often
derive no benefit from them, but merely contract habits of dissipation.
We have therefore to ask on what principle we are to select those
who should go to the university. At present, they are in the main
those whose parents can afford to send them, though this principle of
selection is being increasingly modified by the scholarship system.
Obviously, the principle of selection ought to be educational, not
financial. A boy or girl of eighteen, who has had a good school
education, is capable of doing useful work. If he or she is to be
exempted for a further period of three or four years, the community has
a right to expect that the time will be profitably employed. But before
deciding who is to go to the university, we must have some view as to
the function of the university in the life of the community.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account