Edward Hoare, M.A.: A record of his life based upon a brief autobiographyHoare, Edward
Religion
Edward Hoare, M.A.: A record of his life based upon a brief autobiography
Hoare, Edward
Church of England -- Clergy -- Biography; Hoare, E. (Edward), 1812-1894
As the year draws near its close he describes his position as one of
“overwrought excitement” when his mind dwells upon the approaching
examination, which gives way to “a state of despondency” as a single
thought of his sad home passes before him. Either this depression or the
natural humility of his character makes him now “expect to take a fair
second-rate degree”; when within a fortnight of the examination his mind
becomes calmer, and he is enabled to make a good forecast of the result.
“I have good reason to hope,” he writes, “for a place upon which I shall
look back with pleasure and gratification all my life. . . . My own
desire is to get into the first six wranglers, and if I accomplish that I
shall be delighted. . . . I am not sanguine, but neither am I anxious.
I desire to leave it altogether in the full assurance that I shall get
the place which is best for me, whatever that place may be.”
Surely the influence of the “text for life” is visible here! And those
who knew him in later years will remember that this was his leading
characteristic to the close of his life, making every preparation, using
every endeavour, and then leaving the issue tranquilly in the hands of
Him who “careth for you.”
Christmas Day was spent with his Uncle and Aunt Gurney, and two or three
days at the beginning of the New Year given to his home, to turn away his
mind entirely from mathematics for the last day or two before his
examination. Then two letters appear in the carefully preserved bundle,
one to his mother at Hampstead:—
“I have not time to write much, but I have the unspeakable pleasure
of telling you that I am 5th Wrangler and Robert Pryor 4th. I cannot
say how thankful and happy I feel about it.”
Written hastily, and in suppressed excitement, the date at the head of
the letter—“December 17th, 1833”—is wrong both in the month and year (as
the postmark testifies). The same day he writes more fully to his father
in London; to this letter there is no date at all. Never surely in all
his life did he make either of these mistakes again! (The postmark on
this is the same as on the former letter, viz. January 17th, 1834.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account