Egerton Ryerson and Education in Upper CanadaPutman, J. Harold (John Harold)
History
Egerton Ryerson and Education in Upper Canada
Putman, J. Harold (John Harold)
Education -- Ontario; Ryerson, Egerton, 1803-1882
"We freely admit that we had certain misgivings respecting the
amount of relief which might be expected from the measure proposed,
which from the haughty and dictatorial tone assumed by the Chief
Superintendent of Schools for Upper Canada, in his late
perambulations, we were prepared at least to regard with suspicion.
The terms on which justice has been hitherto meted out in stinted
and niggard instalments, under the existing law, and the many
instances in which it has been withheld or contemptuously refused,
may have rendered us over-sensitive; but we must acknowledge that
when we observe Dr. Ryerson publicly promulgate the conditions on
which he would concede to Catholics the privilege of directing the
education of their own children, we were prepared to expect a
reiterated legislative insult and a gross injustice, not a measure
restrictive, partial and oppressive. We have been most agreeably
disappointed; the Bill of the 'Honourable Attorney-General West,'
with some slight modifications which can be readily introduced in
committee, will form the basis of an educational system of sound
principle, particularly calculated to do justice to all classes of
the community."
The following resolutions of the Synod of the United Presbyterian
Church, printed in the _Globe_, June 30th, 1853, shows the opinion of
that body on the Common School question:--
"Resolved. I. That this Synod approve of a national system of
education, placing all the members of the community upon a level,
and encouraging, as that now in force in this Province does, the use
of the Scriptures under certain reasonable regulations, as are also
prescribed therein.
"II. Holding these views, we deeply regret to perceive the principle
of sectarian schools, so distinctly recognized in the latest
amendments of the Provincial School Act, and do strongly testify
against such a principle as impolitic and mischievous, recognizing
as it does the right of the Government to take the moneys of the
public and appropriate them for the purpose of sustaining and
extending religious distractions, and thereby continuing to
stimulate the elements of discord throughout the community and mar
greatly social interests.
"III. That this Synod recommend to those under their care the use of
every proper and constitutional means to secure the repeal of all
such statutes as recognize the principle of sectarian schools."
The movement for extended Separate School privileges was being
championed by Bishop de Charbonnel, of Toronto. During 1852 he had a
long controversy with Ryerson on the school question.[94] Ryerson's
letters during this controversy make it quite clear that he thought
Separate Schools a huge blunder, and that while he had honestly
attempted to give Roman Catholics all the law allowed them he hoped and
expected to see their schools die a natural death.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account