Egypt of the Pharaohs and of the KhedivéZincke, F. Barham (Foster Barham)
History
Egypt of the Pharaohs and of the Khedivé
Zincke, F. Barham (Foster Barham)
Egypt -- Description and travel; Egypt -- History
Or was it, and this I propose as a third conjecture, that the Hebrews
were too unimaginative a people to realize in thought the conception of
a future life? And, therefore, was this one instance, amongst others,
of the progressiveness of the Revelation, which had spoken in one mode
to the fathers, and which spoke afterwards—of course, within certain
intelligible limitations—in a diverse manner to their descendants? This
progressiveness every one is aware of; but I do not think that the Hebrew
was quite so unimaginative as the supposition implies. The Semitic race
is imaginative in its way. It is, and was, a gross race; which, of
course, implies grossness of imagination; but we can hardly suppose that
the Hebrew of old would have been less capable of imagining a future
Paradise than the modern Arab; though, we may be sure, it would have
assumed, like his, very much of an earthly character; and that earthly
character would not have been of the highest and most refined kind.
Feasting, for instance, would have been an ingredient in the future bliss
of a healthy and hungry people, who, in this world, had very little to
eat. And here it would be interesting to ascertain what, on this subject,
was the belief of the Phœnicians, Canaanites, Moabites, and ancient
Arabians. It is to the point, also, to remember that the Hebrew system
had a Paradise. It was, however, one which came at the beginning, and not
at the end, of all things. It was, also, an earthly Paradise. In this I
see implied contradictions to the Egyptian doctrine on this subject. And
I believe that there are other similarly implied contradictions without
direct references; and that there are such points of allusive protest,
and of intended contrast, is of importance. For instance, I am disposed
to think that the comment on the Ten Commandments—‘these words ... and
no more’ is an implied contradiction of the Divine authority of the
Forty-two Commandments, with reference to which the Egyptian believed
that he should be tried at the Day of Judgment; an article of Egyptian
faith, with which Moses, and the people who were listening to him, must
have been quite familiar; and which could hardly, at that moment, have
been absent from their minds. But as to the supposition before us, I
think, to whatever extent we may be able to allow it to be true in
itself, we shall still be unable to accept it, just as was the case with
the two others we considered before it, as a sufficient cause for the
phenomenon we are now investigating.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account