Egypt of the Pharaohs and of the KhedivéZincke, F. Barham (Foster Barham)
History
Egypt of the Pharaohs and of the Khedivé
Zincke, F. Barham (Foster Barham)
Egypt -- Description and travel; Egypt -- History
A time may come when the moral force of public opinion will outweigh,
and overmatch these natural facilities for establishing, and working a
despotism; but there is no indication in the existing condition of the
country of such a time being at hand. And that this is the only force
that can be of any effect in such a country is demonstrated by its
history. In the remote days of its greatness there was in some sort a
substitute for it in the priestly municipal aristocracy, or oligarchy,
of each city. The priests were the governing class, and supplied the
magistracy. They were an united and powerful body. Wealth, religion,
knowledge, the habitual deference of the people, made them strong. They
thus became, to some considerable extent, a bulwark, behind which, in
each separate city, some of the rights of person and of property could
find protection from the arbitrary caprices of despotism. In this way
something that was in the mind of man was at that time counterworking the
consequences of physical arrangements: and this only is the way in which
a country so circumstanced can be helped in the future.
Nothing, however, of this kind is now at work in modern Egypt. It has,
therefore, but one ground for the hope of escaping from the despotism
which so heavily oppresses it, and that is in the chance of external
aid, which means the chance that some European power should assume the
protectorate of the country. It must, however, be a power in which public
opinion is in favour of liberty and political justice, and in which the
economical value of security for person and property is understood. The
Egyptians themselves desire such a consummation. They know how blessed
to them would be the day which should relieve them from the grinding and
senseless exactions of an oriental taskmaster, and place them under the
sway of good and equal laws. Their wish is that this beneficent protector
should be England. They almost expect that it will be. I was asked, why
do you not come and take possession of the country? In Egypt this appears
the natural conclusion of existing conditions. But a protectorate carried
out thoroughly, and unflinchingly, and entirely for Egyptian objects,
would be far better for both parties than simple English possession. If
we were to make a gain by ruling the country, we should always be tempted
to go a little further. We should find it very difficult to stop at any
particular point, or to be clean-handed at all, when everything was in
our power.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account