Egyptian decorative art : $b A course of lectures delivered at the Royal InstitutionPetrie, W. M. Flinders (William Matthew Flinders)
History
Egyptian decorative art : $b A course of lectures delivered at the Royal Institution
Petrie, W. M. Flinders (William Matthew Flinders)
Decoration and ornament -- Egypt
So far we have viewed only the course of Egyptian design, nor can we
travel far outside of it within these pages. Moreover, as it is dated
before any other such decoration in other countries, it is well to view
its course as a whole without confusing it with the various fragments
borrowed from it by other lands. Yet we may well turn now to see the
beginning of the course of European decoration at Mykenae, and observe
its close contact with that of Egypt. The spiral is the main element of
prehistoric decoration in Greece; the parallel chains of links occur
almost exactly as we have already seen them in the pattern of
Neferhotep, but omitting the inner details added in the spaces.
[Illustration: 65.—Schuck. 290.]
The quadruple spiral is splendidly shown in the ceiling of Orchomenos,
with a lotus flower in each space; also as a simpler form without any
filling in of the squares on the grave stele (Schuck. 146). While even
the ox head with a rosette between the horns, in the grand quintuple
spiral pattern (Fig. 57), is strangely paralleled by an ox head of
silver with a large rosette on the forehead found at Mykenae (Schuck.
248).
In observing these equivalents it must be noted that whole patterns with
their detail are taken over complete from Egypt. There are none of the
series of intermediate steps which we have traced in the mother country;
and where a simpler form occurs it is known to be later, the grave
steles being after the age of the great ceiling. Thus there is the
surest sign of a borrowed art, apart from the facts of the exact
resemblances we have noted. Of course the Mykenaean designs are mostly
influenced by the taste of the race. Many of them are strongly European,
and might be of Celtic or Norse work, as has been shown by Mr. Arthur
Evans; but the source of the designs lies in the two thousand years’
start which Egypt had before Europe awoke.
[Illustration: Fig. 66.]
[Illustration: 67.—R.C. lvii.]
[Illustration: 68.—P. 97. 105.]
[Illustration: 69.—R.C. lxii.]
A separate form of the spiral pattern is that used for borders,
otherwise called the wave or maeander, which merged into the guilloche.
Although the chain of coils on the scarab borders in the XIIth dynasty
may be regarded as a wave border, yet no example is known of this border
on other objects until the XVIIIth dynasty. At that time it appears as
often on foreign objects as on Egyptian, and the only instance of the
guilloche is on foreign dress. Hence this development of the spiral idea
may well be due more to the Aegean civilisation than to that of Egypt.
This will agree with the occurrence of the guilloche on black pottery
from Kahun, which class, wherever it can be dated, is found to belong to
the XIIth-XIIIth dynasty. The metal vases shown on the monuments of the
XVIIIth-XXth dynasties are mostly foreign tributes, and on them the wave
border is common, merging into a twisted rope border which is also
found—though rarely—on scarabs of the Middle Kingdom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account