Egyptian decorative art : $b A course of lectures delivered at the Royal InstitutionPetrie, W. M. Flinders (William Matthew Flinders)
History
Egyptian decorative art : $b A course of lectures delivered at the Royal Institution
Petrie, W. M. Flinders (William Matthew Flinders)
Decoration and ornament -- Egypt
One of the most familiar early motives is wooden framing. This is
continually imitated in the stone figures of doorways in the tombs. The
details of it show that a frame or grate of joinery must have been used
for the porch of large houses, so as to admit light and air while the
door was fastened. The prevalence of such wooden frames or lattices in
modern times in Egypt—known as mushrabiyeh work—shows how suited such a
system is to the climate. Long after the use of stone was general the
frames were imitated, and the pattern survived as a decoration. The same
style of framing was used in the upper part of a house, with decorative
uprights of the hieroglyph _tat_, and was copied as a fancy decoration
in furniture, as seen in a beautiful ivory carving in the Louvre. This
style survived until the XVIIIth dynasty, when it is seen in a tomb at
Thebes (Amenhetop II., Prisse Art) and at the temple of Sedeinga under
Amenhotep III.
[Illustration: Fig. 175.]
[Illustration: Fig. 174.—Ghizeh.]
Much akin to this wood framing is the panelling of the brickwork which
is seen in the earliest examples in Egypt, and is identical with the
panelling of walls in early Babylonia, one of the indications of a
common civilisation of the two great valleys. This panelling does not
seem to have lasted beyond the Old Kingdom; there was no trace of it
found at Kahun or Gurob, in the buildings of the XIIth and XVIIIth
dynasties, nor does it appear in any drawings or imitations of
buildings.
[Illustration: 176.—P. M. vii. (plan).]
[Illustration: Fig. 177.]
One of the best known characteristics of Egyptian architecture is the
sloping face of the walls and pylons. This is directly copied from
brickwork. In order to give more cohesion to a wall it was the custom to
build it on a curved bed, so that the courses all sloped up outwards at
the outer corners. Thus the outer faces sloped inwards, and the wall had
more stability. So wedded were the builders to this method, that where a
long wall of a fort or city was to be built they preferred to begin with
a row of towers of brickwork thus arranged, and then to fill in the
spaces between them with more plain walling. This slope of the walls was
copied in stone at the earliest time. The temple of Sneferu at Medum has
a slope on the face of about 1 in 16, and it was continued down to the
very latest age of Roman building.
[Illustration: 178.—Perring. L.D. II. 44.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account