This was first established by astronomical observation. There is in
astronomy a well-known phenomenon discovered by Bradley which is
called aberration. It consists in this: when we observe a star with a
telescope, the image of the star is not precisely in the direct line of
vision. The reason is that, while the luminous rays of the star which
have entered the telescope are passing down the length of the tube,
the instrument has been slightly displaced, as it shares the movement
of the earth. On the other hand, the luminous ray in the tube does
not share the earth’s motion, and this gives rise to the very slight
deviation which we call aberration. This proves that the medium in
which light travels, the ether which fills the instrument and surrounds
the earth, does not share the earth’s motion.
Many other experiments have settled beyond question that the ether,
which is the vehicle of the waves of light, is not borne along by the
earth as it travels. Now, since the earth moves through the ether as a
ship moves over a stationary lake (not like one floating on a moving
stream), it ought to be possible to detect some evidence of this speed
of the earth in relation to the ether.
One of the devices that may be imagined for the purpose is the
following. We know that the earth turns on itself from west to east,
and travels round the sun in the same way. It follows that in the
middle of the night the revolution of the earth round the sun means
that Paris will be displaced, in the direction from Auteuil toward
Charenton, at a speed of about thirty kilometres a second. During the
day, of course, it is precisely the opposite. Paris changes its place
round the sun in the direction from Charenton toward Auteuil. Well, let
us suppose that at midnight a physicist at Auteuil sends a luminous
signal. A physicist receiving this ray of light at Charenton, and
measuring its velocity, ought to find that the latter is =V= + 30
kilometres. We know that, as a result of the earth’s motion, Charenton
recedes before the ray of light. Consequently, since light travels
in a medium, the ether, which does not share the earth’s motion, the
observer at Charenton ought to find that the ray reaches him at a less
speed than it would if the earth were stationary. It is much the same
as if an observer were travelling on a bicycle in front of an express
train. If the express travels at thirty metres a second and the cyclist
at three metres a second, the speed of the train in relation to the
cyclist will be 30-3 = 27 metres a second. It would be _nil_ if
the train and the cyclist were travelling at the same rate.
On the other hand, if the cyclist were going toward the train, the
speed of the train in relation to him would be 30 + 3 = 33 metres a
second. Similarly, when the physicist at Charenton sends out a luminous
message at midnight, and the physicist of Auteuil receives it, the
latter ought to find that the ray of light has a velocity of =V= +
30 kilometres.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account