2. The fact of aberration and other phenomena seems to prove
that the ether is not displaced by the earth during its
course round the sun.
3. Michelson’s experiment seems to prove, on the contrary, that
the earth bears the ether with it in its movement.
This contradiction between facts of equal authority was for years
the despair and the wonder of physicists. It was the Gordian knot of
science. Long and fruitless efforts were made to untie it until at last
Einstein cut it with a single blow of his remarkably acute intelligence.
In order to understand how that was done—which is the vital point of
the whole system—we must retrace our steps a little and examine the
precise conditions of Michelson’s famous experiment.
I pointed out in the preceding chapter that Michelson proposed to study
the speed of a ray of light produced in the laboratory and directed
either from east to west or west to east: that is to say, in the
direction in which the earth itself moves, at a speed of about eighteen
miles a second, as it travels round the sun, or in the opposite
direction. As a matter of fact, Michelson’s experiment was rather more
complicated than that, and we must return to it.
Four mirrors are placed at an equal distance from each other in the
laboratory, in pairs which face each other. Two of the opposing
mirrors are arranged in the direction east-west, the direction in
which the earth moves in consequence of its revolution round the sun.
The other two are arranged in a plane perpendicular to the preceding,
the direction north-south. Two rays of light are then started in the
respective directions of the two pairs of mirrors. The ray coming from
the mirror to the east goes to the mirror in the west, is reflected
therefrom, and returns to the first mirror. This ray is so arranged
that it crosses the path of the light which goes from north to south
and back. It interferes with the latter light, causing “fringes of
interference” which, as I said, enable us to learn the exact distance
traversed by the rays of light reflected between the pairs of mirrors.
If anything brought about a difference between the length of the two
distances, we should at once see the displacement of a certain number
of interference-fringes, and this would give us the magnitude of the
difference.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account