Einstein's Theories of Relativity and Gravitation: A selection of material from the essays submitted in the competition for the Eugene Higgins prize of $5,000Bird, J. Malcolm (James Malcolm)
Philosophy
Einstein's Theories of Relativity and Gravitation: A selection of material from the essays submitted in the competition for the Eugene Higgins prize of $5,000
Bird, J. Malcolm (James Malcolm)
Relativity (Physics)
In order to appreciate the fundamental ideas involved, suppose for
a moment that gravitation could be annihilated, completely, and
suppose I find myself upon this earth in empty space. You shall be
seated at some point in space and shall watch my doings. If I am in
the condition of mind of the people of the reign of King Henry VIII,
I shall believe that the earth does not rotate. If I let go a stone,
there being no gravity, I shall find that it flies away from me with
an acceleration. You will know, however, that the stone really moves
in a straight line with constant velocity, and that the apparent
acceleration which I perceive is due to the earth's rotation. If I
have argued that acceleration is due to force, I shall say that the
earth repels the stone, and shall try to find the law governing the
variation of this force with distance. I may go farther, and try to
imagine some reason for the force, some pushing action transmitted from
the earth to the stone through a surrounding medium; and, you will
pity me for all this wasted labor, and particularly for my attempt
to find a mechanism to account for the force, since you know that if
I would only accept your measurements all would appear so simple.
Let us probe this matter a little farther, however, from the
stand-point of myself. I must believe in the reality of the force,
since I have to be tied to my chair to prevent my departure from
the earth. I might wonder how this field of force would affect the
propagation of light, chemical action and so forth. For, even though I
had discovered that, by using your measures, I could transform away the
apparent effects of my field of force as far as concerned its power
to hurl stones about, I could still regard this as a mathematical
accident, and believe that the force was really there. Although I
might suspect that the same transformation of view-point that would
annul the field's effect as regards the stones would also annul its
effect as regards light, etc., I should not be sure of this, as you
would be; and my conscience would hardly allow me to do more than
look upon the assumption of complete equivalence between the apparent
field and a change in the system of measurement as a hypothesis. I
should be strongly tempted to make the hypothesis, however.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account