You ask what is the difference? Well, it is much easier to ask a
question than it is to answer it. You will remember that in the chapter
on magnetism it was stated that the molecules of a magnet were little
natural magnets, and that their attractions were satisfied within
themselves; that when their local attachments were broken up and all
their like poles turned in one direction they could act upon other
pieces of iron outside of the magnet. Outside and between the poles
there are magnetic lines of force reaching out from one pole to the
other. If we put a piece of iron across the poles these lines of force
are gathered up and pass through the iron. This is purely a static
condition. Let us go back to the cell of battery. When the elements are
in position (the copper, the acidulated water and the zinc), and the two
wires attached to the two metals which are the two poles of the battery
not yet connected, there is a condition induced in these two wires that
did not exist before the acidulated water was poured in, although the
circuit is not yet established. If we test the two wires we find a
difference of potential--a state of strain, so to speak--that did not
exist before the acid acted on the zinc and liberated what was stored
energy. It is in a static condition, like the magnet, and electrical
lines of force are reaching out from both wires so that the ether is in
a state of strain between the two poles. The air molecules may partake
of it, but we have to bring in the ether as a substance, because the
same conditions would practically exist if the two wires were in a
vacuum. If now we connect the two wires, we have established a metallic
circuit between the two poles of the battery, the static conditions are
relieved, the lines of force are gathered up into the wire, and the
phenomenon that we call a current is established and we have dynamic or
moving electricity.
Having established the so-called electric current we will now try to
show you that there really is no current. The idea of a current involves
the idea of a fluid substance flowing from one point to another. When
you were a boy did you never set up a row of bricks on their ends, just
far enough apart so that if you pushed one over they all fell one after
another? Now, imagine rows of molecules or atoms, and in your
imagination they may be arranged like the bricks, so that they are
affected one by the other successively with a rapidity that is akin to
that of light-waves, and you can conceive how a motion may be
communicated from end to end of a wire hundreds of miles in length in a
small fraction of a second, and no material substance has been carried
through the wire--only energy. We do not mean to say that the row of
bricks illustrates the exact mode of molecular or atomic motion that
takes place in a conductor. What we mean is, that in some way motion is
passed along from atom to atom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account