Such a work is invaluable to the student; for, independently of
imparting sound surgical knowledge, it does more to form his judgment,
and to qualify him for the practical duties of his profession than all
the compilations in Christendom. Velpeau, with all his learning and all
his patience, has never furnished anything equal to it. His "_Medicine
Operatoire_" is nothing but a vast storehouse of research, to which
pompous doctors may resort for ancient lore, and prosing teachers for
materials for instruction. It details with endless minuteness the
operative methods of every surgeon, great or little, from the age of
Hippocrates to the present period, with their various modifications
and improvements, not forgetting the "appreciations" and labours of
the able professor himself. Such productions are well enough in their
way; they serve to give us an idea of the rise and progress of surgery,
and form good books of reference. Beyond this, however, they are of
comparatively little utility; the great mass of the profession is no
more benefited by them than if they had never been written; few read
them, and still fewer understand them. This attempt at erudition
pervades, if I mistake not, almost every recent publication on surgery
in the French language. Dupuytren is alone free from it. His writings
breathe throughout a different and more independent spirit: he speaks
like one accustomed to act and to think for himself; and the result
is, that he has accomplished more for French surgery than any other
Frenchman since the days of Ambrose Paré.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account