Elements of the Theory and Practice of Chymistry, 5th ed.Macquer, Pierre Joseph
History
Elements of the Theory and Practice of Chymistry, 5th ed.
Macquer, Pierre Joseph
Chemistry -- Early works to 1800
Metallic Substances have affinities with each other which differ
according to their different kinds: but this is not universal; for some
of them are incapable of any sort of union with some others.
It must be observed, that Metallic Substances will not unite, except
they be both in a similar state; that is, both in a Metalline form, or
both in the form of a Glass; for a Metalline Substance retaining its
phlogiston cannot contract an union with any metallic glass, even its
own.
CHAP. VII.
_Of_ METALS.
There are six Metals, of which two are Perfect and four Imperfect. The
perfect Metals are Gold and Silver; the others are Copper, Tin, Lead,
and Iron. Some Chymists admit a seventh Metal, to wit, Quick-silver:
but as it is not malleable, it has been generally considered as a
metallic body of a particular kind. We shall soon have occasion to
examine it more minutely.
The ancient Chymists, or rather the Alchymists, who fancied a certain
relation or analogy between Metals and the Heavenly Bodies, bestowed
on the seven Metals, reckoning Quick-silver one of them, the names of
the seven Planets of the Ancients, according to the affinity which
they imagined they observed between those several bodies. Thus Gold
was called _Sol_, Silver _Luna_, Copper _Venus_, Tin _Jupiter_, Lead
_Saturn_, Iron _Mars_, and Quick-silver _Mercury_. Though these names
were assigned for reasons merely chimerical, yet they still keep their
ground; so that it is not uncommon to find the Metals called by the
names, and denoted by the characters, of the Planets, in the writings
even of the best Chymists. Metals are the heaviest bodies known in
nature.
SECTION I.
_Of_ GOLD.
Gold is the heaviest of all Metals. The arts of wire-drawing and
gold-beating shew its wonderful ductility. The greatest violence
of fire is not able to produce any alteration in it. Indeed Mr.
Homberg, a famous Chymist, pretended that he had made this metal fume,
and even vitrified it, by exposing it to the focus of one of the
best burning-glasses, known by the name of the Lens of the _Palais
Royal_: but, there are very good reasons for calling in question the
experiments he made on this occasion, or rather for thinking that he
was quite mistaken. For,
1. No man hath since been able to vitrify Gold, though several good
Experimenters have assiduously tried to effect it, by exposing it to
the focus of the same lens, and of other burning-glasses still stronger.
2. It hath been observed, that though Gold, when exposed to the focus
of those glasses, did indeed emit some vapours and decrease in weight;
yet, those vapours being carefully collected on a piece of paper,
proved to be true Gold, in no degree vitrified, and which consequently
had suffered no change but that of being carried away by the violence
of the heat, its nature not being in the least altered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account