Stokes's theorem becomes an obvious truism if applied to an
incompressible fluid. Let a _source_ of fluid be a point from which an
incompressible fluid is emitted in all directions. Close to the source
the stream lines will be radial lines. Let a very small sphere be
described round the source, and let the strength of the source be
defined as the total flow per second through the surface of this small
sphere. Then if we have any number of sources enclosed by any surface,
the total flow per second through this surface is equal to the total
strengths of all the sources. If, however, we defined the strength of
the source by the statement that the strength divided by the square
of the distance gives the velocity of the liquid at that point, then
the total flux through any enclosing surface would be 4[pi] times the
strengths of all the sources enclosed. To every proposition in
electrostatics there is thus a corresponding one in the hydrokinetic
theory of incompressible liquids.
Let us apply the above theorem to the case of a small
parallel-epipedon or rectangular prism having sides dx, dy, dz
respectively, its centre having co-ordinates (x, y, z). Its angular
points have then co-ordinates (x ± ½dx, y ± ½dy, z ± ½dz). Let this
rectangular prism be supposed to be wholly filled up with electricity
of density [rho]; then the total quantity in it is [rho] dx dy dz.
Consider the two faces perpendicular to the x-axis. Let V be the
potential at the centre of the prism, then the normal forces on the
two faces of area dy·dx are respectively
/dV 1 d²V \ /dV 1 d²V \
- ( -- + -- --- dx ) and ( -- - -- --- dx ),
\dx 2 dx² / \dx 2 dx² /
and similar expressions for the normal forces to the other pairs of
faces dx·dy, dz·dx. Hence, multiplying these normal forces by the
areas of the corresponding faces, we have the total flux parallel to
the x-axis given by -(d²V/dx²)dx dy dz, and similar expressions for
the other sides. Hence the total flux is
/d²V d²V d²V\
- ( --- + --- + --- ) dx dy dz
\dx² dy² dz²/
and by the previous theorem this must be equal to 4[pi][rho]dx dy dz.
d²V d²V d²V
Hence --- + --- + --- + 4[pi][rho] = 0 (18).
dx² dy² dz²
This celebrated equation was first given by S.D. Poisson, although
previously demonstrated by Laplace for the case when [rho] = 0. It
defines the condition which must be fulfilled by the potential at any
and every point in an electric field, through which [rho] is finite
and the electric force continuous. It may be looked upon as an
equation to determine [rho] when V is given or vice versa. An exactly
similar expression holds good in hydrokinetics, provided that for the
electric potential we substitute velocity potential, and for the
electric force the velocity of the liquid.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account