If [sigma] is the surface density and dS an element of surface, then
[int][sigma]dS is the whole charge, and hence ½ [int] V[sigma]dS is
the expression for the energy of charge of a conductor.
We can deduce a remarkable expression for the energy stored up in an
electric field containing electrified bodies as follows:[19] Let V
denote the potential at any point in the field. Consider the integral
_ _ _ _ _
1 / / / | /dV\² /dV\² /dV\² |
W = ----- | | | |(----) + (----) + (----) | dx dy dz. (21)
8[pi]_/_/_/ |_\dx/ \dy/ \dz/ _|
where the integration extends throughout the whole space unoccupied by
conductors. We have by partial integration
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
/ / / /dV\² / / dV / / / d²V
| | |(----) dx dy dz = | | V -- dy dz - | | | V --- dx dy dz,
_/_/_/ \dx/ _/_/ dx _/_/_/ dx²
and two similar equations in y and z. Hence
_ _ _ _ _
1 / / / | /dV\² /dV\² /dV\² |
----- | | | | (----) + (----) + (----) | dx dy dz =
8[pi]_/_/_/ |_ \dx/ \dy/ \dz/ _|
_ _ _ _ _
1 / / dV 1 / / /
----- | | V -- dS - ----- | | | V[nabla]V dx dy dz (22)
8[pi]_/_/ dn 8[pi]_/_/_/
where dV/dn means differentiation along the normal, and [nabla] stands
d² d² d²
for the operator --- + --- + ---. Let E be the resultant electric force
dx² dy² dz²
at any point in the field. Then bearing in mind that [sigma] =
(¼[pi])dV/dn, and [rho] = -(¼[pi])[nabla]V, we have finally
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
1 / / / 1 / / 1 / / /
----- | | | E²dv = -- | | V[sigma]dS + -- | | | V[rho]dv.
8[pi] _/_/_/ 2 _/_/ 2 _/_/_/
The first term on the right hand side expresses the energy of the
surface electrification of the conductors in the field, and the second
the energy of volume density (if any). Accordingly the term on the
left hand side gives us the whole energy in the field.
Suppose that the dielectric has a constant K, then we must multiply
both sides by K and the expression for the energy per unit of volume
of the field is equivalent to ½DE where D is the displacement or
polarization in the dielectric.
Furthermore it can be shown by the application of the calculus of
variations that the condition for a minimum value of the function W,
is that [nabla]V = 0. Hence that distribution of potential which is
necessary to satisfy Laplace's equation is also one which makes the
potential energy a minimum and therefore the energy stable. Thus the
actual distribution of electricity on the conductor in the field is
not merely a stable distribution, it is _the only_ possible stable
distribution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account