/ [lambda] + 2s[pi] [lambda] + 2s[pi] \
x = [root n][rho] ( cos ----------------- + i sin ----------------- ),
\ n n /
which has the n values obtained by giving to s the values 0, 1, 2 ...
n - 1 in succession; the roots are, it is clear, represented by points
lying at equal intervals on a circle. But it is more convenient to
proceed somewhat differently; taking one of the roots to be [theta],
so that [theta]^n = a, then assuming x = [theta]y, the equation
becomes y^n - 1 = 0, which equation, like the original equation, has
precisely n roots (one of them being of course = 1). And the original
equation x^n - a = 0 is thus reduced to the more simple equation x^n -
1 = 0; and although the theory of this equation is included in the
preceding one, yet it is proper to state it separately.
The equation x^n - 1 = 0 has its several roots expressed in the form
1, [omega], [omega]^2, ... [omega]^(n - 1), where [omega] may be taken
= cos 2[pi]/n + i sin 2[pi]/n; in fact, [omega] having this value, any
integer power [omega]^k is = cos 2[pi]k/n + i sin 2[pi]k/n, and we
thence have ([omega]^k)^n = cos 2[pi]k + i sin 2[pi]k, = 1, that is,
[omega]^k is a root of the equation. The theory will be resumed
further on.
By what precedes, we are led to the notion (a numerical) of the
radical a^(1/n) regarded as an n-valued function; any one of these
being denoted by [root n]a, then the series of values is [root n]a,
[omega][root n]a, ... [omega]^(n - 1)[root n]a; or we may, if we
please, use [root n]a instead of a^(1/n) as a symbol to denote the
n-valued function.
As the coefficients of an algebraical equation may be numerical, all
which follows in regard to algebraical equations is (with, it may be,
some few modifications) applicable to numerical equations; and hence,
concluding for the present this subject, it will be convenient to pass
on to algebraical equations.
_Algebraical Equations._
11. The equation is
x^n - p1x^(n-1) + ... [+-]p_n = 0,
and we here _assume_ the existence of roots, viz. we assume that there
are n quantities a, b, c ... (in general all of them different, but
which in particular cases may become equal in sets in any manner), such
that
x^n - p1x^(n - 1) + ... [+-] p_n = 0;
or looking at the question in a different point of view, and starting
with the roots a, b, c ... as given, we express the product of the n
factors x - a, x - b, ... in the foregoing form, and thus arrive at an
equation of the order n having the n roots a, b, c.... In either case we
have
p1 = [Sigma]a, p2 = [Sigma]ab, ... p_n = abc ...;
i.e. regarding the coefficients p1, p2 ... p_n as given, then we assume
the existence of roots a, b, c, ... such that p1 = [Sigma]a, &c.; or,
regarding the roots as given, then we write p1, p2, &c., to denote the
functions [Sigma]a, [Sigma]ab, &c.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account