[17] Vaughan (_Pharm. Journ._ xii. 1853) speaks of the Arabian Luban,
commonly called _Morbat_ or _Shaharree Luban_, as realizing higher
prices in the market than any of the qualities exported from Africa.
The incense of "Esher," i.e. Shihr or Shehr, is mentioned by Marco
Polo, as also by Barbosa. (See Yule, _op. cit._ ii. p. 377.) J.
Raymond Wellsted (_Travels to the City of the Caliphs_, p. 173,
Lond., 1840) distinguishes two kinds of frankincense--"_Meaty_,"
selling at $4 per cwt., and an inferior article fetching 20% less.
[18] "Es scheint, dass selber die Araber ihr eignes Raeuchwerk nicht
hoch schaetzen; denn die Vornehmen in Jemen brauchen gemeiniglich
indianisches Raeuchwerk, ja eine grosse Menge Mastix von der Insel
Scio" (_Beschreibung von Arabien_, p. 143, Kopenh., 1772).
[19] "De Arabibus minus mirum, qui nigricantem colorem, quo Thus
Indicum praeditum esse vult Dioscorides [lib. i. c. 70], Indum
plerumque vocent, ut ex Myrobalano nigro quem Indum appellant, patet"
(_op. sup. cit._ p. 157).
FRANKING, a term used for the right of sending letters or postal
packages free (Fr. _franc_) of charge. The privilege was claimed by the
House of Commons in 1660 in "a Bill for erecting and establishing a Post
Office," their demand being that all letters addressed to or sent by
members during the session should be carried free. The clause embodying
this claim was struck out by the Lords, but with the proviso in the Act
as passed for the free carriage of all letters to and from the king and
the great officers of state, and also the single inland letters of the
members of that present parliament during that session only. It seems,
however, that the practice was tolerated until 1764, when by an act
dealing with postage it was legalized, every peer and each member of the
House of Commons being allowed to send free ten letters a day, not
exceeding an ounce in weight, to any part of the United Kingdom, and to
receive fifteen. The act did not restrict the privilege to letters
either actually written by or to the member, and thus the right was very
easily abused, members sending and receiving letters for friends, all
that was necessary being the signature of the peer or M.P. in the corner
of the envelope. Wholesale franking grew usual, and M.P.'s supplied
their friends with envelopes already signed to be used at any time. In
1837 the scandal had become so great that stricter regulations came into
force. The franker had to write the full address, to which he had to add
his name, the post-town and the day of the month; the letter had to be
posted on the day written or the following day at the latest, and in a
post-town not more than 20 m. from the place where the peer or M.P. was
then living. On the 10th of January 1840 parliamentary franking was
abolished on the introduction of the uniform penny rate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account