While one after another of the
Freiberg doctrines crumbled away before him, he was now able to
interrogate nature on a wider field than the narrow limits of Saxony,
and he was thus gradually led to embrace the tenets of the opposite
school. His commanding position, as the most accomplished geologist on
the continent, gave great importance to his recantation of the
Neptunist creed. His defection indeed was the severest blow that this
creed had yet sustained. It may be said to have rung the knell of
Wernerianism, which thereafter rapidly declined in influence, while
Plutonism came steadily to the front, where it has ever since
remained.
Although Desmarest had traced in Auvergne a long succession of
volcanic eruptions, of which the oldest went back to a remote period
of time, and although he had shown that this succession, coupled with
the records of contemporaneous denudation, might be used in defining
epochs of geological history, it was not until many years after his
day that volcanic action came to be recognized as a normal part of the
mechanism of our globe, which had been in operation from the remotest
past, and which had left numerous records among the rocks of the
terrestrial crust. During the progress of the controversy between the
two great opposing factions in the later portion of the 18th and the
first three decades of the 19th century, those who espoused the
Vulcanist cause were intent on proving that certain rocks, which are
intercalated among the stratified formations and which were claimed by
the Neptunists as obviously formed by water, are nevertheless of truly
igneous origin. These observers fixed their eyes on the evidence that
the material of such rocks, instead of having been deposited from
aqueous solution, had once been actually molten, and had in that
condition been thrust between the strata, had enveloped portions of
them, and had indurated or otherwise altered them. They spoke of these
masses as "unerupted lavas"; and undoubtedly in innumerable instances
they were right. But their zeal to establish an intrusive origin led
them to overlook the proofs that some intercalated sheets of igneous
material had not been injected into the strata, but had been poured
out at the surface as truly volcanic discharges, and therefore
belonged to the ancient periods represented by the strata between
which they are interposed. It may readily be supposed that any proofs
of the contemporaneous intercalation of such sheets would be eagerly
seized upon by the Neptunists in favour of their aqueous theory. The
influence of the ancient belief that "burning mountains" could only
rise from the combustion of subterranean inflammable materials
extended even into the ranks of the Vulcanists, so far at least as to
lead to a general acquiescence in the assumption that volcanoes
appeared to belong to a late phase in the history of the planet. It
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account