It has been suggested that, where the life-zones are well defined,
sedimentation has been extremely slow, and that though these zones
follow each other with no break in the sedimentation, they were really
separated by prolonged intervals of time during which organic
evolution could come effectively into play. But it is not easy to
explain how, for example in the Lower Lias, there could have been a
succession of prodigious intervals, when practically no sediment was
laid down, and yet that the strata should show no sign of
contemporaneous disturbance or denudation, but succeed each other as
if they had been accumulated by one continuous process of deposit. It
must be admitted that the problem of life-zones in stratigraphical
geology has not yet been solved.
As Darwin first cogently showed, the history of life has been very
imperfectly registered in the stratified parts of the earth's crust.
Apart from the fact that, even under the most favourable conditions,
only a small proportion of the total flora and fauna of any period
would be preserved in the fossil state, enormous gaps occur where no
record has survived at all. It is as if whole chapters and books were
missing from a historical work. Some of these lacunae are sufficiently
obvious. Thus, in some cases, powerful dislocations have thrown
considerable portions of the rocks out of sight. Sometimes extensive
metamorphism has so affected them that their original characters,
including their organic contents, have been destroyed. Oftenest of
all, denudation has come into play, and vast masses of fossiliferous
rock have been entirely worn away, as is demonstrated by the abundant
unconformabilities in the structure of the earth's crust.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account