The uncertainties of terrestrial refraction render it impossible to
determine accurately by vertical angles the heights of distant points.
Generally speaking, refraction is greatest at about daybreak; from
that time it diminishes, being at a minimum for a couple of hours
before and after mid-day; later in the afternoon it again increases.
This at least is the general march of the phenomenon, but it is by no
means regular. The vertical angles measured at the station on Hart
Fell showed on one occasion in the month of September a refraction of
double the average amount, lasting from 1 P.M. to 5 P.M. The mean
value of the coefficient of refraction k determined from a very large
number of observations of terrestrial zenith distances in Great
Britain is .0792 [+-] .0047; and if we separate those rays which for a
considerable portion of their length cross the sea from those which do
not, the former give k = .0813 and the latter k = .0753. These values
are determined from high stations and long distances; when the
distance is short, and the rays graze the ground, the amount of
refraction is extremely uncertain and variable. A case is noted in the
Indian survey where the zenith distance of a station 10.5 miles off
varied from a depression of 4' 52".6 at 4.30 P.M. to an elevation of
2' 24".0 at 10.50 P.M.
If h, h' be the heights above the level of the sea of two stations, 90
deg. + [delta], 90 deg. + [delta]' their mutual zenith distances
([delta] being that observed at h), s their distance apart, the earth
being regarded as a sphere of radius = a, then, with sufficient
precision,
/ 1 - 2k \ / 1 - 2k \
h' - h = s tan ( s -------- - [delta] ), h - h' = s tan ( -------- - [delta]' ).
\ 2a / \ 2a /
If from a station whose height is h the horizon of the sea be observed
to have a zenith distance 90 deg. + [delta], then the above formula
gives for h the value
a tan^2 [delta]
h = -- -------------.
2 1 - 2k
Suppose the depression [delta] to be n minutes, then h = 1.054n^2 if
the ray be for the greater part of its length crossing the sea; if
otherwise, h = 1.040n^2. To take an example: the mean of eight
observations of the zenith distance of the sea horizon at the top of
Ben Nevis is 91 deg. 4' 48", or [delta] = 64.8; the ray is pretty
equally disposed over land and water, and hence h = 1.047n^2 = 4396
ft. The actual height of the hill by spirit-levelling is 4406 ft., so
that the error of the height thus obtained is only 10 ft.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account