Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Groups, Theory of" to "Gwyniad": Volume 12, Slice 6 — John Shaqi
Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Groups, Theory of" to "Gwyniad": Volume 12, Slice 6Various
Science
Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Groups, Theory of" to "Gwyniad": Volume 12, Slice 6
Various
Encyclopedias and dictionaries
(iii.) and (iv.) The groups simply isomorphic with the totality of the
projective transformations which change a quadric of non-vanishing
discriminant into itself. These fall into two distinct classes of
types according as n is even or odd. In either case the order is
1/2n(n + 1). The case n = 3 forms an exception in which the
corresponding group is not simple. It is also to be noticed that a
cyclical group is a simple group, since it has no continuous
self-conjugate subgroup distinct from itself.
W. K. J. Killing and E. J. Cartan have separately proved that outside
these four great classes there exist only five distinct types of
simple groups, whose orders are 14, 52, 78, 133 and 248; thus
completing the enumeration of all possible types.
To prevent any misapprehension as to the bearing of these very general
results, it is well to point out explicitly that there are no
limitations on the parameters of a continuous group as it has been
defined above. They are to be regarded as taking in general complex
values. If in the finite equations of a continuous group the imaginary
symbol does not explicitly occur, the finite equations will usually
define a group (in the general sense of the original definition) when
both parameters and variables are limited to real values. Such a group
is, in a certain sense, a continuous group; and such groups have been
considered shortly by Lie (cf. Lie-Engel, iii. 360-392), who calls
them _real_ continuous groups. To these real continuous groups the
above statement as to the totality of simple groups does not apply;
and indeed, in all probability, the number of types of _real_ simple
continuous groups admits of no such complete enumeration. The effect
of limitation to real transformations may be illustrated by
considering the groups of projective transformations which change
x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - 1 = 0 and x^2 + y^2 - z^2 - 1 = 0
respectively into themselves. Since one of these quadrics is changed
into the other by the imaginary transformation
x' = x, y' = y, z' = z[root](-1),
the general continuous groups which transform the two quadrics
respectively into themselves are simply isomorphic. This is not,
however, the case for the _real_ continuous groups. In fact, the
second quadric has two real sets of generators; and therefore the real
group which transforms it into itself has two self-conjugate
subgroups, either of which leaves unchanged each of one set of
generators. The first quadric having imaginary generators, no such
self-conjugate subgroups can exist for the real group which transforms
it into itself; and this real group is in fact simple.
The adjunct group.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account