Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Groups, Theory of" to "Gwyniad": Volume 12, Slice 6 — John Shaqi
Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Groups, Theory of" to "Gwyniad": Volume 12, Slice 6Various
Science
Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Groups, Theory of" to "Gwyniad": Volume 12, Slice 6
Various
Encyclopedias and dictionaries
A group is spoken of as _simple_ when it has no self-conjugate
subgroup other than that constituted by the identical operation alone.
A group which has a self-conjugate subgroup is called _composite_.
Let G be a group constituted of the operations S, T, U, ..., and g a
second group constituted of s, t, u, ..., and suppose that to each
operation of G there corresponds a single operation of g in such a way
that if ST = U, then _st_ = u, where s, t, u are the operations
corresponding to S, T, U respectively. The groups are then said to be
_isomorphic_, and the correspondence between their operations is
spoken of as an _isomorphism_ between the groups. It is clear that
there may be two distinct cases of such isomorphism. To a single
operation of g there may correspond either a single operation of G or
more than one. In the first case the isomorphism is spoken of as
_simple_, in the second as _multiple_.
Two simply isomorphic groups considered abstractly--that is to say, in
regard only to the way in which their operations combine among
themselves, and apart from any concrete representation of the
operations--are clearly indistinguishable.
If G is multiply isomorphic with g, let A, B, C, ... be the operations
of G which correspond to the identical operation of g. Then to the
operations A^(-1) and AB of G there corresponds the identical
operation of g; so that A, B, C, ... constitute a subgroup H of G.
Moreover, if R is any operation of G, the identical operation of g
corresponds to every operation of R^(-1)HR, and therefore H is a
self-conjugate subgroup of G. Since S corresponds to s, and every
operation of H to the identical operation of g, therefore every
operation of the set SA, SB, SC, ..., which is represented by SH,
corresponds to s. Also these are the only operations that correspond
to s. The operations of G may therefore be divided into sets, no two
of which contain a common operation, such that the correspondence
between the operations of G and g connects each of the sets H, SH, TH,
UH, ... with the single operations 1, s, t, u, ... written below them.
The sets into which the operations of G are thus divided combine among
themselves by exactly the same laws as the operations of g. For if
st = u, then SH.TH = UH, in the sense that any operation of the set
SH followed by any operation of the set TH gives an operation of the
set UH.
The group g, abstractly considered, is therefore completely defined by
the division of the operations of G into sets in respect of the
self-conjugate subgroup H. From this point of view it is spoken of as
the _factor-group_ of G in respect of H, and is represented by the
symbol G/H. Any composite group in a similar way defines abstractly a
factor-group in respect of each of its self-conjugate subgroups.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account