His introduction to Euclid took place accidentally in 1629 (Aubrey's
_Lives_, p. 604). Euclid's manner of proof became the model for his
own way of thinking upon all subjects. It is less easy to determine
when he awoke to an interest in the physical doctrine of motion. The
story told by himself (_Vit._ p. xx.) is that, hearing the question
asked "What is sense?" he fell to thinking often on the subject, till
it suddenly occurred to him that if bodies and their internal parts
were at rest, or were always in the same state of motion, there could
be no distinction of anything, and consequently no sense; the cause of
all things must therefore be sought in diversity of movements.
Starting from this principle he was driven to geometry for insight
into the ground and modes of motion. The biographies we possess do not
tell us where or when this great change of interest occurred. Nothing
is said, however, which contradicts a statement that on his third
journey in Europe he began to study the doctrine of motion more
seriously, being interested in it before; and as he claims more than
once (_L.W._ v. 303; _E.W._ vii. 468) to have explained light and
sound by a mechanical hypothesis as far back as 1630, the inspiration
may be assigned to the time of the second journey. But it was not till
the third journey that the new interest became an overpowering
passion, and the "philosopher" was on his way home before he had
advanced so far as to conceive the scheme of a system of thought to
the elaboration of which his life should henceforth be devoted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account